Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5475
Next month in: 03:34:20
Server time: 04:25:39, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Social Democratic Cabinet of 2472

Details

Submitted by[?]: Catholic Workers Union

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2473

Description[?]:

The democratic left unites to return social democracy to Telamon.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:20:33, October 18, 2007 CET
FromLes Pirates Ninja Napoléoniens
ToDebating the Social Democratic Cabinet of 2472
MessageAbsolutely ridiculous.

You have failed to represent a large amount of the parties involved here. Although we hold no seats, we find this extremely selfish and unnecessary.

Date22:55:22, October 18, 2007 CET
FromRegional Acronym Political Establishment
ToDebating the Social Democratic Cabinet of 2472
MessageThe spoils of an election go to the victors. It is disappointing that our party will lose cabinet positions, but that only means that we must do better in the elections. We are ideologically opposed to the progressives, but we hope to make a few alliances following the next election and return to power.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 343

no
   

Total Seats: 304

abstain
  

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

Random quote: "I think you should defend to the death their right to march, and then go down and meet them with baseball bats." - Woody Allen, on the Ku Klux Klan

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 53