We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Fireworks Regulation
Details
Submitted by[?]: Leviathan Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2101
Description[?]:
| Local governments should be allowed to determine the legality of fireworks. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy towards fireworks.
Old value:: Fireworks of all sorts are illegal.
Current: Local governments determine fireworks laws.
Proposed: Local governments determine fireworks laws.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:03:09, August 21, 2005 CET | From |  Protectorate Party | To | Debating the Fireworks Regulation |
| Message | agree |
| Date | 01:58:30, August 22, 2005 CET | From | LibCom Party | To | Debating the Fireworks Regulation |
| Message | Quite. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 100 | |||||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
| Random quote: "In all recorded history there has not been one economist who has had to worry about where the next meal would come from." - Peter Drucker |