We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Reducing Legislation to an actual value of Importance Bill 2475
Details
Submitted by[?]: Guds og Konges Kjemprene
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2479
Description[?]:
| Right now, all parties are allowed to make a ridiculously high number of proposals. Let's cut this down, so that the national samlingen is forced to concentrate on vital matters, and to increase its efficiency. OOC: Now, I don't think we really need 50 proposals maximum. Let's cut this down, so that there is no pressure to use them all in order to avoid loosing visibility. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The number of proposals a party can introduce per year (will be handed out as a monthly quota).
Old value:: 20
Current: 20
Proposed: 15
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The maximum proposal quota a party can accumulate.
Old value:: 50
Current: 20
Proposed: 15
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:08:53, October 23, 2007 CET | From | Guds og Konges Kjemprene | To | Debating the Reducing Legislation to an actual value of Importance Bill 2475 |
| Message | OOC: I only can say that this proposed number was normal in the state's I've played in so far, and it made playing far more interesting. But of course, this will be open for discussion. |
| Date | 19:32:04, October 23, 2007 CET | From | Middleton Party | To | Debating the Reducing Legislation to an actual value of Importance Bill 2475 |
| Message | OOC: I honestly don't know enough about this game yet to say yea or nay to this. I would think being able to retain more than the yearly allotment would be preferable, but I'll mull it over a bit. |
| Date | 19:35:14, October 23, 2007 CET | From | Guds og Konges Kjemprene | To | Debating the Reducing Legislation to an actual value of Importance Bill 2475 |
| Message | Actually, it is not really practicable. Fifteen proposals are in fact, if you look at other countries, not as few as it might sound. Normally, it is hardly able to run out of proposals, if you play this at a normal rate. |
| Date | 20:24:20, October 23, 2007 CET | From | CSA Communist Party of the DPRK | To | Debating the Reducing Legislation to an actual value of Importance Bill 2475 |
| Message | more propules more stablity in the current sutiwation of goverment because lets say theres an bad law that was pased a long time ago but every party has used all there propsels with a propsel limit the party's cannot modify the law untill a little bit. |
| Date | 21:06:14, October 23, 2007 CET | From | Guds og Konges Kjemprene | To | Debating the Reducing Legislation to an actual value of Importance Bill 2475 |
| Message | That hardly happens. In fact, I never saw that happen, as it almost never occurs that all parties are out of proposals, and even then it's to blame on them, because if the law is so bad, that it can't wait a single month to be changed, the parties should have done that first. Our country is hardly in a position so bad that this could be a real threat. |
| Date | 21:16:24, October 23, 2007 CET | From | Science and Environment Party | To | Debating the Reducing Legislation to an actual value of Importance Bill 2475 |
| Message | I can't see neither harm or any good coming out from this suggestion. |
| Date | 23:33:03, October 23, 2007 CET | From | Pertetuum Kazulia | To | Debating the Reducing Legislation to an actual value of Importance Bill 2475 |
| Message | Write down efficiency and you can count us in. Most times... |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 463 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 113 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 174 |
| Random fact: Alduria, Rildanor and Lourenne all have Canrilaise (French) cultures. |
| Random quote: "What is conservatism? Is it not the adherence to the old and tried against the new and untried?" - Abraham Lincoln |