We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Civil Defense, January 2477
Details
Submitted by[?]: Computational Intellect Project
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2477
Description[?]:
| Defend our people! Long live Barmenistan! |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Civil defence is the government's policy on providing shelters to be used in the event of attacks on major cities, mainly nuclear attacks and bombing.
Old value:: The government builds and maintains a network of shelters across the nation.
Current: The government builds and maintains a network of shelters across the nation.
Proposed: No new buildings may be constructed unless they feature provisions for civil defence.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 12:09:03, October 28, 2007 CET | From | Computational Intellect Project | To | Debating the Civil Defense, January 2477 |
| Message | Someone who voted no, please explain to us what is wrong with requiring civil defense in all buildings? |
| Date | 12:10:50, October 28, 2007 CET | From | Computational Intellect Project | To | Debating the Civil Defense, January 2477 |
| Message | Somehow, it seems parties such as the Liberal Party, the Independent Centrist Party, and the Social Democratic Pacifist Party should be voting in favor of this resolution, as they are pacifist parties that do not want to see any Barmenistanians get hurt, and this bill would ultimately accomplish that; keeping all Barmenistanians safe in the event of a bombing. |
| Date | 23:53:48, October 28, 2007 CET | From | United Party of Church and People | To | Debating the Civil Defense, January 2477 |
| Message | The answer is simple: these bomb shelters are pretty costly to build, and it just shouldn't be the People's fiscal responsibility. These shelters should be built using money from the Ministry of Defense budget, but making private companies build these using their own money is simply unfair. |
| Date | 20:57:26, October 29, 2007 CET | From | Computational Intellect Project | To | Debating the Civil Defense, January 2477 |
| Message | Suppose we raised the defense budget and enacted it into law that the Ministry of Defense would provide for the bomb shelter construction in every single building? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 97 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 116 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Moderation will not accept Cultural Protocol updates which introduce, on a significant scale, cultures which are likely to be insufficiently accessible to players. In particular, for all significant cultures in Particracy, it should be easy for players to access and use online resources to assist with language translation and the generation of character names. Moderation reserves the right to amend Cultural Protocols which are deemed to have introduced significant cultures that are not sufficiently accessible and which are not being actively role-played with. |
| Random quote: "He who wishes to be obeyed must know how to command." - Niccolo Machiavelli |