We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Agreement to the Use of Peacekeeping Forces in Beitenyu-Pontesi Conflict Area
Details
Submitted by[?]: Jakanian Imperial Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2480
Description[?]:
George Falco, This bill is for the agreement of using and organizing a peacekeeping contengent to the occupied areas of Beitenyu to promote a cease-fire. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 20:31:21, October 31, 2007 CET | From | United Democrats of Jakania | To | Debating the Agreement to the Use of Peacekeeping Forces in Beitenyu-Pontesi Conflict Area |
Message | Sounds good to me. Does it sound to our defence minister? |
Date | 03:00:10, November 01, 2007 CET | From | World Wrestling Federation | To | Debating the Agreement to the Use of Peacekeeping Forces in Beitenyu-Pontesi Conflict Area |
Message | Yes. We would also like to set up a base in the region for our peace keeping force. Dr Falco, could you see if this is a possibility diplomatically? |
Date | 08:21:46, November 01, 2007 CET | From | Jakanian Imperial Party | To | Debating the Agreement to the Use of Peacekeeping Forces in Beitenyu-Pontesi Conflict Area |
Message | The Pontesis have sent terms of a Jakinian peacekeeping force. We are still working on that. |
Date | 17:55:43, November 01, 2007 CET | From | Jakanian Imperial Party | To | Debating the Agreement to the Use of Peacekeeping Forces in Beitenyu-Pontesi Conflict Area |
Message | We need to send a large force, the Pontesi have like 200,000 troops and the Beitenyuis have like undisclosed amount. Somewhere in the neighborhood of 150,000 or so, unless you have some bigger number in mind. Also, are we sending air, naval, and armored units there too? |
Date | 22:01:48, November 01, 2007 CET | From | Birleşik Demokrat Parti | To | Debating the Agreement to the Use of Peacekeeping Forces in Beitenyu-Pontesi Conflict Area |
Message | I dont see the need to send such things as air units etc too. We have threats across our own borders too |
Date | 02:02:01, November 02, 2007 CET | From | Jakanian Imperial Party | To | Debating the Agreement to the Use of Peacekeeping Forces in Beitenyu-Pontesi Conflict Area |
Message | Yeah, but we could probably send at least a couple light-medium armored units, Humvee and Bradley, maybe a few Abrams. Some medical helicopter, and transport helicopters units. We could send a couple destroyers to send food aid and more manpower in terms of sailors. The peacekeeping force needs a couple transport/supply wheeled units. From the air force, we probably need an airlift transport jets and some tankers to provide aerial refueling. Need regular infantry and some of our part-time reserve units for the bulk of the peacekeeping force. Although we should keep all of our heavy armor, attack helicopters, carrier battle groups, combat jets, elite units, most regulars troops should stay. |
Date | 02:32:12, November 02, 2007 CET | From | World Wrestling Federation | To | Debating the Agreement to the Use of Peacekeeping Forces in Beitenyu-Pontesi Conflict Area |
Message | 150,000 troops would be fine for a minimum. Lets keep it around 150,000 - 200,000. Armored units are a must. Air and naval would be dependent on the access we're going to be allowed to their airspace and waterways. The department of defense would be 100% supportive of all peace keeping possibilities. |
Date | 05:13:59, November 02, 2007 CET | From | Jakanian Imperial Party | To | Debating the Agreement to the Use of Peacekeeping Forces in Beitenyu-Pontesi Conflict Area |
Message | We will be returning on that later. We still trying to communicate. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 120 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 122 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 8 |
Random fact: Head to the "Language assistance" thread to receive and offer help with translations: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6368 |
Random quote: "You can only progress when you think big, you can only move forward when you look further." - Arria Ivmarus, former Selucian politician |