Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5475
Next month in: 00:41:44
Server time: 11:18:15, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): dannypk19 | Dx6743 | echizen | LC73DunMHP | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Agreement to the Use of Peacekeeping Forces in Beitenyu-Pontesi Conflict Area

Details

Submitted by[?]: Jakanian Imperial Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2480

Description[?]:

George Falco,

This bill is for the agreement of using and organizing a peacekeeping contengent to the occupied areas of Beitenyu to promote a cease-fire.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date20:31:21, October 31, 2007 CET
FromUnited Democrats of Jakania
ToDebating the Agreement to the Use of Peacekeeping Forces in Beitenyu-Pontesi Conflict Area
MessageSounds good to me.

Does it sound to our defence minister?

Date03:00:10, November 01, 2007 CET
FromWorld Wrestling Federation
ToDebating the Agreement to the Use of Peacekeeping Forces in Beitenyu-Pontesi Conflict Area
MessageYes. We would also like to set up a base in the region for our peace keeping force. Dr Falco, could you see if this is a possibility diplomatically?

Date08:21:46, November 01, 2007 CET
FromJakanian Imperial Party
ToDebating the Agreement to the Use of Peacekeeping Forces in Beitenyu-Pontesi Conflict Area
MessageThe Pontesis have sent terms of a Jakinian peacekeeping force. We are still working on that.

Date17:55:43, November 01, 2007 CET
FromJakanian Imperial Party
ToDebating the Agreement to the Use of Peacekeeping Forces in Beitenyu-Pontesi Conflict Area
MessageWe need to send a large force, the Pontesi have like 200,000 troops and the Beitenyuis have like undisclosed amount.

Somewhere in the neighborhood of 150,000 or so, unless you have some bigger number in mind.

Also, are we sending air, naval, and armored units there too?

Date22:01:48, November 01, 2007 CET
FromBirleşik Demokrat Parti
ToDebating the Agreement to the Use of Peacekeeping Forces in Beitenyu-Pontesi Conflict Area
MessageI dont see the need to send such things as air units etc too. We have threats across our own borders too

Date02:02:01, November 02, 2007 CET
FromJakanian Imperial Party
ToDebating the Agreement to the Use of Peacekeeping Forces in Beitenyu-Pontesi Conflict Area
MessageYeah, but we could probably send at least a couple light-medium armored units, Humvee and Bradley, maybe a few Abrams. Some medical helicopter, and transport helicopters units. We could send a couple destroyers to send food aid and more manpower in terms of sailors. The peacekeeping force needs a couple transport/supply wheeled units.
From the air force, we probably need an airlift transport jets and some tankers to provide aerial refueling.

Need regular infantry and some of our part-time reserve units for the bulk of the peacekeeping force.

Although we should keep all of our heavy armor, attack helicopters, carrier battle groups, combat jets, elite units, most regulars troops should stay.

Date02:32:12, November 02, 2007 CET
FromWorld Wrestling Federation
ToDebating the Agreement to the Use of Peacekeeping Forces in Beitenyu-Pontesi Conflict Area
Message150,000 troops would be fine for a minimum. Lets keep it around 150,000 - 200,000.

Armored units are a must. Air and naval would be dependent on the access we're going to be allowed to their airspace and waterways. The department of defense would be 100% supportive of all peace keeping possibilities.

Date05:13:59, November 02, 2007 CET
FromJakanian Imperial Party
ToDebating the Agreement to the Use of Peacekeeping Forces in Beitenyu-Pontesi Conflict Area
MessageWe will be returning on that later. We still trying to communicate.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 120

no
    

Total Seats: 122

abstain
 

Total Seats: 8


Random fact: Head to the "Language assistance" thread to receive and offer help with translations: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6368

Random quote: "You can only progress when you think big, you can only move forward when you look further." - Arria Ivmarus, former Selucian politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 59