We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Privatization of Energy
Details
Submitted by[?]: Independence Coalition
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2480
Description[?]:
| In order to increase efficiency, and relieve an unnecessary burden on the government, we propose that the the nation's energy generation facilities and power distribution network be privatized. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on energy generation.
Old value:: Small scale private electrical generation is permitted but most energy is generated by a government-owned company.
Current: Small scale private electrical generation is permitted but most energy is generated by a government-owned company.
Proposed: Private power stations provide energy for the entire power grid.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on the nation's power grid.
Old value:: The national grid is fully owned by the state.
Current: Each region owns and maintains its own power grid.
Proposed: Multiple private companies each own and maintain sections of the national power grid.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 01:50:40, November 03, 2007 CET | From |  Pan-Sekowo Freedom Alliance | To | Debating the Privatization of Energy |
| Message | We would vote yes on this |
| Date | 02:32:08, November 03, 2007 CET | From | Revolutionary State Socialist Party | To | Debating the Privatization of Energy |
| Message | We don't particularly care for this. |
| Date | 02:41:10, November 03, 2007 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Privatization of Energy |
| Message | We are vehemently against this. Power generation are among one of the few industries that we believe should be conpletely owned by the state. People should'nt have to pay for power. |
| Date | 03:11:31, November 03, 2007 CET | From | Independence Coalition | To | Debating the Privatization of Energy |
| Message | The state should not be able to snuff out competition in any industry. |
| Date | 03:45:15, November 03, 2007 CET | From | Independence Coalition | To | Debating the Privatization of Energy |
| Message | Whether you tax the people and give them "free" electricity or allow private companies to charge people for electricity, the people are ultimately still paying for power! Why not allow competition and allow a chance for lower energy prices to emerge? By removing the burden of maintenance and distribution off the shoulders of the government you allow for a chance for reduced taxes. By allowing competition, you force prices to remain low, which could possibly provide energy to the people at a cheaper price from private companies than the government can with a state owned monopoly |
| Date | 05:52:50, November 03, 2007 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Privatization of Energy |
| Message | Corporations by there very nature are untrustworthy, and will only seek to make the maximum profit while providing as little as possible. The government actively searches and develops better technology to provide the maximum amount of energy for the lowest price possible. |
| Date | 05:53:20, November 03, 2007 CET | From | Sekowan Communist Party | To | Debating the Privatization of Energy |
| Message | By allowing the privitization of power plants, what would occur would be a race to the bottom, with a select few companies succeeding by buying out those run less shrewdly, resulting in what would amount to a monopoly controlled by unelected company board officers concerned with profits above the people's welfare. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 207 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 265 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 127 |
| Random fact: RP laws follow the same passing rules as in-game variable laws. Laws that are not of a constitutional nature require a simple majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. Laws that are of a constitutional nature require a 2/3 majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. RP laws may be abolished a simple majority vote this applies to ANY RP law. |
| Random quote: "Democrats always assure us that deterrence will work, but when the time comes to deter, they're against it. " - Ann Coulter |