Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5475
Next month in: 03:34:10
Server time: 12:25:49, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): echizen | Freemarket21 | Liu Che | Mbites2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Ratification of the Majartan Economic Community (MEC)

Details

Submitted by[?]: Jakanian Imperial Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2481

Description[?]:

This bill asks for the ratification of the Majartan Economic Community (MEC). If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:39:57, November 03, 2007 CET
FromJakanian Imperial Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Majartan Economic Community (MEC)
MessageOur Coburan neighbors have formed this treaty. I said we would look into it, it looks good, we can still run our economy the way we want to I think. So take a look and debate about it.

Date19:33:39, November 03, 2007 CET
FromWorld Wrestling Federation
ToDebating the Ratification of the Majartan Economic Community (MEC)
MessageI'm not sure how their market standards would interfere with our goal for nationwide privatization and deregulation ...

Date19:49:39, November 03, 2007 CET
FromUnion of Democratic Socialists
ToDebating the Ratification of the Majartan Economic Community (MEC)
MessageWe'd rather not see the Common Agricultural Policy in there, subsidies for farmers and price intervention should be decided upon at a national level, as it's our economy - the other principles of the Community are fine.

Date20:51:31, November 03, 2007 CET
FromBirleşik Demokrat Parti
ToDebating the Ratification of the Majartan Economic Community (MEC)
MessageThis looks good for us...

Date23:24:35, November 03, 2007 CET
FromUnited Democrats of Jakania
ToDebating the Ratification of the Majartan Economic Community (MEC)
MessageWe would support such a treaty

Date05:54:46, November 04, 2007 CET
FromJakanian Imperial Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Majartan Economic Community (MEC)
MessageSRP, the vague writing over the CAP doesn't state that MEC would have full control of that. I think MEC would acknowledge the fact of us authorizing a CAP and let us deal with it in what we think is best.

Date07:36:58, November 04, 2007 CET
FromScientific Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Majartan Economic Community (MEC)
MessageWe don't think we like parts of this. Particularly the bit about "Subsidies are to be paid to farmers growing particular crops". If it were just the free-trade agreement, we could get behind that. But we can't vote yes to ratify a treaty that both violates our sovereignty and forces us to hand out subsidies, which can only harm the economy. And even if it were vaguely worded, the implication would be bad enough.

Date04:22:04, November 05, 2007 CET
FromUnion of Democratic Socialists
ToDebating the Ratification of the Majartan Economic Community (MEC)
MessageI suggest we join, but only on the condition that we don't ratify article 5.
If you can negotiate that, we'll happily support joining.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 133

no
    

Total Seats: 109

abstain
 

Total Seats: 8


Random fact: All role-play must respect the established cultural background in Culturally Protected nations.

Random quote: "The only stable state is the one in which all men are equal before the law." - Aristotle

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 69