We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Homeland Protection Act 2
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberal Party of Telamon
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2102
Description[?]:
We again propose that refugees are let into the country only under severe circumstances |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The national refugee policy.
Old value:: All refugees are welcome, regardless of their reason, and given aid in integrating them into the country.
Current: Only refugees that are victims of extreme circumstances are welcome; they are given integration-aid.
Proposed: Only refugees that are victims of extreme circumstances are welcome; no aid is given to them.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 18:57:26, August 22, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Party of Telamon | To | Debating the Homeland Protection Act 2 |
Message | I'll consider this bill.... |
Date | 21:06:58, August 22, 2005 CET | From | Rationalist Party | To | Debating the Homeland Protection Act 2 |
Message | We agree that not everyone claiming to be a refugee should be allowed into our country. |
Date | 00:04:21, August 23, 2005 CET | From | Progressive Marxist Party | To | Debating the Homeland Protection Act 2 |
Message | Why? How do you determine extreme circumstances? This will lead to abuse. We have UN sanctions agains such and such nation, their refugees are not welcome. We have an alliance with such and such nation. Their refugees have no reason to flee. |
Date | 03:18:07, August 23, 2005 CET | From | Rationalist Party | To | Debating the Homeland Protection Act 2 |
Message | Extreme I would say would be the same as most nations are now. If they have reason to fear for their lives or freedom, then they can come in, as opposed to saying, because I want to be a refugee. |
Date | 15:11:13, August 27, 2005 CET | From | Telamon National Party | To | Debating the Homeland Protection Act 2 |
Message | This is a good step in the right direction. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 50 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 125 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 80 |
Random fact: RP laws follow the same passing rules as in-game variable laws. Laws that are not of a constitutional nature require a simple majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. Laws that are of a constitutional nature require a 2/3 majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. RP laws may be abolished a simple majority vote this applies to ANY RP law. |
Random quote: "We live in a world in which politics has replaced philosophy." - Martin L. Gross |