We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Changing of Retirement age
Details
Submitted by[?]: Democratic Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2481
Description[?]:
We propose to change the retirement age |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the pension system.
Old value:: The state offers a voluntary public pension, combined with other voluntary private pensions.
Current: The state operates a compulsory public system combined with an optional private pension.
Proposed: The state does not operate a pension system. Individuals must save up for retirement on their own.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The professional retirement age.
Old value:: 65
Current: 60
Proposed: 60
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 00:33:42, November 04, 2007 CET | From | Liberty Party | To | Debating the Changing of Retirement age |
Message | "As there is no public pension system, we see this bill as largely irrelevant." Michale Tucker, Minister of Finance |
Date | 09:08:51, November 04, 2007 CET | From | Liberty Party | To | Debating the Changing of Retirement age |
Message | "Your solution is to force people to hand over money to private corporations? That defeats the purpose of privatization in the first place; to give people choice. If you eliminate the public sector all together, you'll have our support." ~Michale Tucker |
Date | 03:52:11, November 05, 2007 CET | From | Democratic Party | To | Debating the Changing of Retirement age |
Message | Is this bill to the satisfaction of the LP |
Date | 06:46:19, November 05, 2007 CET | From | Liberty Party | To | Debating the Changing of Retirement age |
Message | "Yes, though the retirement age is irreverent now that you propose a privatization of the pension system." ~Michale Tucker |
Date | 12:17:38, November 05, 2007 CET | From | Ancient and Noble Order of the Cavaliers | To | Debating the Changing of Retirement age |
Message | "If it does anything, it sets a limit on when private companies may begin to disperse reitrement funds. Certainly, citizens may work past this age, but companies may not set some absurd age as the retirement mark." -the Earl of Hatteras, Directory Member |
Date | 20:42:58, November 05, 2007 CET | From | Irish Party | To | Debating the Changing of Retirement age |
Message | No. The state should be involved, even if it's just overseeing it all. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 228 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 173 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: You can view helpful ideological statistics about the regions in your nation on the region pages. You can also view detailed political opinions and the importance of them there as well. |
Random quote: "Soldiers who are not afraid of guns, bombs, capture, torture or death say they are afraid of homosexuals. Clearly we should not be used as soldiers; we should be used as weapons." - Letter to the editor, the Advocate |