We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Constitutional Amendment

Details

Submitted by^[?]: Rightist Party

Status^[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2482

Description^[?]:

This will increase the number of proposals parties can introduce per year. It will raise it from 12 to 15 to match the other constitutional amendment.

Proposals

Article 1

Proposal^[?] to change The number of proposals a party can introduce per year (will be handed out as a monthly quota).

Old value:: 12

Current: 20

Proposed: 15

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date	02:43:21, November 05, 2007 CET
From	Judicial Union Party
To	Debating the Constitutional Amendment
Message	We oppose this also. As it is, a party gets one proposal a month. That is tidy.

Date	02:50:07, November 05, 2007 CET
From	Rightist Party
To	Debating the Constitutional Amendment
Message	Is it? Or is it restrictive? I believe it is restrictive. This way...the political parties can be alot more active in bill creation. Is that wrong?

Date	03:44:17, November 05, 2007 CET
From	Judicial Union Party
To	Debating the Constitutional Amendment
Message	The law should not change quickly and often; if that is restrictive, then so be it. That is part of the rule of law, which we suggest should be required study before a person becomes a legislator.

Date	03:55:18, November 05, 2007 CET
From	Rightist Party
To	Debating the Constitutional Amendment
Message	HAHA!! Oh boy now you are picking on the wrong person for that sort of talk!!! LOL!!

Date	05:06:15, November 05, 2007 CET
From	Judicial Union Party
To	Debating the Constitutional Amendment
Message	Oh, and why would that be matey?

Date	05:29:45, November 05, 2007 CET
From	Rightist Party
To	Debating the Constitutional Amendment
Message	Because I graduated from college with a Political Science degree. LMAO!!!

Date	05:33:45, November 05, 2007 CET
From	Judicial Union Party
To	Debating the Constitutional Amendment
Message	Perhaps you ought to have studied the law too then.

Date	09:14:28, November 05, 2007 CET
From	Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists
To	Debating the Constitutional Amendment
Message	12 or 15, we don't really care.. both are fine.

Date	14:47:29, November 05, 2007 CET
From	Rightist Party
To	Debating the Constitutional Amendment
Message	To study law means I want to be a lawyer. Sorry but I do not want to be a lawyer though I have been told that I would make an excellent lawyer for I know the right buttons to push.

Date	15:11:31, November 05, 2007 CET
From	Judicial Union Party
To	Debating the Constitutional Amendment
Message	You don't get a degree just for a job. What about education for education's sake?

Date	16:45:47, November 05, 2007 CET
From	Rightist Party
To	Debating the Constitutional Amendment
Message	Funny you should say that when you are opposing the Pratical Education Bill. And besides, where did you get the idea that I got a degree just for a job?

Date	22:05:10, November 05, 2007 CET
From	Judicial Union Party
To	Debating the Constitutional Amendment
Message	You are saying you don't want to study law because you don't want to be a lawyer. It follows from that that you believe you study for a job. It's entirely consistently with our stance on that bill. That bill encourages education only for practical reasons.

Date	00:33:07, November 06, 2007 CET
From	Rightist Party
To	Debating the Constitutional Amendment
Message	Which you still have yet to prove. So take your foot out of your mouth and prove the assertion.

Date	05:30:56, November 07, 2007 CET
From	Rightist Party
To	Debating the Constitutional Amendment
Message	Oh and FLF? This bill and the other amendment benefits you. You can create all the little tyrannical bills you like.

Date	11:54:06, November 07, 2007 CET
From	Flemish Liberation Front
To	Debating the Constitutional Amendment
Message	naaah... putting this country under my dictatorship should be a slow but steady process... i'm with JUP on this one.

Date	15:29:29, November 07, 2007 CET
From	Rightist Party
To	Debating the Constitutional Amendment
Message	Just trying to help you. You should be grateful for I was thinking about giving you a cabinet position if I'm elected head of state. Probably 2 or 3 depending on results.

Date	17:56:41, November 07, 2007 CET
From	Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists
To	Debating the Constitutional Amendment
Message	eeew

Date	20:17:12, November 07, 2007 CET
From	Rightist Party
To	Debating the Constitutional Amendment
Message	does it matter? No because it failed.

Date	20:17:36, November 07, 2007 CET
From	Rightist Party
To	Debating the Constitutional Amendment
Message	Cabinet positions for all who change votes :D

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote

Seats

yes

Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists (110)
Rightist Party (0)

Total Seats: 110

Total Seats: 389

abstain

spiller.1985 Party (0)
Crazy Raving Lunatic Party (0)

Total Seats: 0

Random fact: "Spamming", or the indiscriminate posting of unsolicited messages, is not allowed.

Random quote: "The National Rifle Association says, 'Guns don't kill people; people kill people,' but I think the gun helps." - Eddie Izzard

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 72