We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Water Quality Amendment Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Judicial Union Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2482
Description[?]:
An act to simplify regulations relating to water quality. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Regulation of the quality of drinking water.
Old value:: The government sets a range of standards dependant on water usage. (grey water regulation, etc.)
Current: The government sets a range of standards dependant on water usage. (grey water regulation, etc.)
Proposed: The government sets a single standard to ensure all tap water is drinkable.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 03:10:55, November 05, 2007 CET | From | Judicial Union Party | To | Debating the Water Quality Amendment Act |
Message | The system we have now is unnecessarily complex. Ultimately, all the regulation is doing is to make water drinkable. Why do we not just make that the regulation directly? |
Date | 03:28:32, November 05, 2007 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Water Quality Amendment Act |
Message | Because this way...it costs less |
Date | 03:45:03, November 05, 2007 CET | From | Judicial Union Party | To | Debating the Water Quality Amendment Act |
Message | The proposed way costs less to regulate. It is a simple binary question: drinkable or not? |
Date | 03:53:55, November 05, 2007 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Water Quality Amendment Act |
Message | What we hvae currently makes sure it is drinkable. What you are proposing is the polar opposite. It is forcing water companies to meet one standard. That is going to cost way more than what it is currently. |
Date | 15:30:06, November 07, 2007 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Water Quality Amendment Act |
Message | passed. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 389 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 110 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Bill descriptions must be in English, or at least include a full English translation. Bill titles may appear in a language that is appropriate to the nation and are not required to be translated into English. |
Random quote: "An economist is a surgeon with an excellent scalpel and a rough-edged lancet, who operates beautifully on the dead and tortures the living." - Nicholas Chamfort |