We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Agriculture (Devolution of Hemp Regulation) Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Judicial Union Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2483
Description[?]:
An act to devolve to local governments responsibility for regulating hemp. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Policy concerning industrial hemp.
Old value:: Only regulated agribusinesses may produce industrial hemp.
Current: Industrial hemp regulations are left up to local governments.
Proposed: Industrial hemp regulations are left up to local governments.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 22:38:50, November 05, 2007 CET | From | Judicial Union Party | To | Debating the Agriculture (Devolution of Hemp Regulation) Act |
Message | Why should the government concern itself with whether or not a particular good is produced? That seems hardly important enough to warrant nationwide legislation. |
Date | 23:04:52, November 05, 2007 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Agriculture (Devolution of Hemp Regulation) Act |
Message | why should there be any regulation? Why not put it back where it was before this sudden interest in it! |
Date | 00:06:14, November 06, 2007 CET | From | Judicial Union Party | To | Debating the Agriculture (Devolution of Hemp Regulation) Act |
Message | We currently have no opinion on whether it should be regulated. The local governments will have a better idea of what is best for their tribe in relation to this issue. |
Date | 00:25:23, November 06, 2007 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Agriculture (Devolution of Hemp Regulation) Act |
Message | Are you sure of that? |
Date | 00:26:11, November 06, 2007 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Agriculture (Devolution of Hemp Regulation) Act |
Message | Are you sure of that? |
Date | 06:27:45, November 06, 2007 CET | From | Judicial Union Party | To | Debating the Agriculture (Devolution of Hemp Regulation) Act |
Message | Yes. We have faith in the tribes. They were once entirely independent, and managed perfectly well. |
Date | 11:07:01, November 06, 2007 CET | From | Flemish Liberation Front | To | Debating the Agriculture (Devolution of Hemp Regulation) Act |
Message | we do not support |
Date | 20:26:25, November 07, 2007 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Agriculture (Devolution of Hemp Regulation) Act |
Message | The Rightist Party calls the question |
Date | 17:32:33, November 08, 2007 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Agriculture (Devolution of Hemp Regulation) Act |
Message | Failed |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 115 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 274 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 110 |
Random fact: Periodically, it is a good idea to go through your nation's Treaties and arrange to withdraw from any that are unwanted. |
Random quote: "There is a sufficiency in the world for man's need but not for man's greed." - Mahatma Gandhi |