We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: The FP/LIP/GRP Alliance Cabinet
Details
Submitted by[?]: Freedom Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2100
Description[?]:
| Sorry i forgot you last time GRP. I swear i changed my name to yours. *puzzled look* |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the 
Freedom Party
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Grand Republican Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Freedom Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Freedom Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Freedom Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Liberal Imperialist Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Grand Republican Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Liberal Imperialist Party
Article 9
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Grand Republican Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Liberal Imperialist Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:59:31, August 22, 2005 CET | From | Grand Republican Party | To | Debating the The FP/LIP/GRP Alliance Cabinet |
| Message | I like this one a lot more... |
| Date | 17:00:44, August 22, 2005 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the The FP/LIP/GRP Alliance Cabinet |
| Message | Sorry about that. I swear i put you in. Weird. Are you ok with the positions you have? |
| Date | 17:02:23, August 22, 2005 CET | From | Grand Republican Party | To | Debating the The FP/LIP/GRP Alliance Cabinet |
| Message | I'm all good. Long as I keep Justice, the other positions are fine with me. |
| Date | 17:16:50, August 22, 2005 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the The FP/LIP/GRP Alliance Cabinet |
| Message | We find the accusations by the RSDP in there cabinet proposal to be scandalous. Economic extremism? no. Economic RIGHTism. The RSDP wants a unity cabinet when it doesnt have a majority, but if it does then it has no hesitation to exclude the Freedom Party and the LAP when they were in existance. Look back at previous cabinets, you will see what i mean. |
| Date | 17:19:50, August 22, 2005 CET | From | RSDP - Democratic Front | To | Debating the The FP/LIP/GRP Alliance Cabinet |
| Message | "The RSDP wants a unity cabinet when it doesnt have a majority, but if it does then it has no hesitation to exclude the Freedom Party and the LAP when they were in existance. Look back at previous cabinets, you will see what i mean." I have never excluded you from a Cabinet, when the left had a majority. You either didn't want to be a part of it, or my coalition partners were against it. |
| Date | 17:20:21, August 22, 2005 CET | From | RSDP - Democratic Front | To | Debating the The FP/LIP/GRP Alliance Cabinet |
| Message | I never said "economic extremism". ;-) |
| Date | 17:35:58, August 22, 2005 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the The FP/LIP/GRP Alliance Cabinet |
| Message | Im pretty sure you did. I cant prove it and neither can you because you removed your cabinet proposal ;-) |
| Date | 17:42:20, August 22, 2005 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the The FP/LIP/GRP Alliance Cabinet |
| Message | http://82.238.75.178:8085/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=8490 http://82.238.75.178:8085/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=9134 |
| Date | 17:59:22, August 22, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Imperialist Party | To | Debating the The FP/LIP/GRP Alliance Cabinet |
| Message | Aye. So long as I have defence Im happy. |
| Date | 18:03:38, August 22, 2005 CET | From | RSDP - Democratic Front | To | Debating the The FP/LIP/GRP Alliance Cabinet |
| Message | And? Those links provide no evidence whatsoever of your accussations. |
| Date | 18:47:21, August 22, 2005 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the The FP/LIP/GRP Alliance Cabinet |
| Message | You proposed the cabinets, they are full of leftie parties and there is nowhere on there that says something like "Id like a unity cabinet but my partners dont want one" So it completely proves my argument. |
| Date | 18:56:07, August 22, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Imperialist Party | To | Debating the The FP/LIP/GRP Alliance Cabinet |
| Message | Agreed. I only put RSDP in my first cabinet because me and the GRP didnt hold a majority with the FP inactive, and I only put HSP in it because RSDP wouldnt support it if I didnt. That wasnt a unity cabinet, you just used your position with swing seats to shoehorn your allies into the cabinet, RSDP. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 364 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 144 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 91 |
| Random fact: If your "Bills under debate" section is cluttered up with old bills created by inactive parties, report them for deletion on the Bill Clearouts Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363 |
| Random quote: "Abolition of a woman's right to abortion, when and if she wants it, amounts to compulsory maternity: a form of rape by the State." - Edward Abbey |