We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Axis Mundi LFF Stability Initiative 1
Details
Submitted by[?]: Permissive Social Union
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2484
Description[?]:
| Too many government changes. Too much uncertainty. Too much so-called liberty. We propose that this be adopted to ensure that the country never again falls to a non Axis Mundi rabble. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The number of proposals a party can introduce per year (will be handed out as a monthly quota).
Old value:: 12
Current: 20
Proposed: 1
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The maximum proposal quota a party can accumulate.
Old value:: 12
Current: 50
Proposed: 5
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The constitutional right and responsibility to propose a cabinet to the legislature.
Old value:: Each party can propose a cabinet coalition.
Current: Each party can propose a cabinet coalition.
Proposed: Only the Head of State can propose a cabinet coalition.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change Structure of the executive branch.
Old value:: The Head of State and Head of Government are two separate officials.
Current: The Head of State and Head of Government are two separate officials.
Proposed: The Head of State is hereditary and symbolic; the Head of Government chairs the cabinet.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 03:18:42, November 06, 2007 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Axis Mundi LFF Stability Initiative 1 |
| Message | We might be able to support this platform. |
| Date | 03:19:29, November 06, 2007 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Axis Mundi LFF Stability Initiative 1 |
| Message | We spoke too soon... we notice that there are clauses being added between our responses! We shall refrain from comment for a while. Patience IS a virtue, eh? |
| Date | 03:28:19, November 06, 2007 CET | From | Permissive Social Union | To | Debating the Axis Mundi LFF Stability Initiative 1 |
| Message | The LFF has now completed complilation of this important legislation. |
| Date | 05:55:49, November 06, 2007 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Axis Mundi LFF Stability Initiative 1 |
| Message | We return to our earlier tentative support. |
| Date | 12:11:59, November 09, 2007 CET | From | Kapitalist-Arbeitsfamilien Partei | To | Debating the Axis Mundi LFF Stability Initiative 1 |
| Message | We must respectfully decline the LFF's attempt to make our party chairman, Emissary Christian E. Savage, the KING the rule over the good socialist citizentry of the Republic of Likatonia (haha)!!! We would rather live under a DEMOCRATIC socialist government rather than an AUTOCRATIC capitalist one!!! |
| Date | 15:27:15, November 09, 2007 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Axis Mundi LFF Stability Initiative 1 |
| Message | The CWFP wants a democratic socialist government in preference to an autocratic capitlaist one? Then - why do they keep attacking the laws of this land, which are currently both democratic and socialistic? |
| Date | 08:20:18, November 11, 2007 CET | From | Kapitalist-Arbeitsfamilien Partei | To | Debating the Axis Mundi LFF Stability Initiative 1 |
| Message | .....b/c the PEOPLE of Likatonia want CAPITALISM and the socialist parties are using "dirty tricks" to prevent the voice of the people from being heard. According to the nation page, the people favor CAPITALISM over regulation. And that is what we will fight for. |
| Date | 13:53:59, November 11, 2007 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Axis Mundi LFF Stability Initiative 1 |
| Message | What is this 'nation page' of which the CWFP speak? Some kind of subversive manifesto circulating in the underground? We don't care where you get information... we are not concerned by what you think you know. The people keep choosing Red. As far as we are aware - all parties can still propose law? As far as we are aware, all parties can still be voted for? The CWFP may say that it is dirty tricks keeping the Reds in power, but that is beginning to look more and more like sour grapes. |
| Date | 14:01:05, November 11, 2007 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Axis Mundi LFF Stability Initiative 1 |
| Message | OOC: The CWFP raised the spectre of 'dirty tricks' with their talk of playing the advantages of the game mechanics... insisting on pushing through omnibus bills... trying to change the law to make it easier, even. If the CWFP don't like the idea political processes can be used against them as well as against other people, perhaps they shouldn't have decided to frame the action that way. As a matter of interest - in terms of game mechanics, even an advantage to laissez-faire capitalism over regulation, is deceptive. Firstly - it doesn't actually mean they even LIKE capitalism - there is just a preference for less regulation. Secondly - it is also important how extreme the voters are - those who are not bothered either way might not even vote - and when was the last time Likatonia had 100% turnout? Third - As in real life... people are more likely to vote if they want something changed. I don't want to get in to it too deeply here, but the current climate in Likatonia is actually driving more Red voters to the polls. |
| Date | 19:46:08, November 11, 2007 CET | From | Democratic Workers' Party and CTUL List | To | Debating the Axis Mundi LFF Stability Initiative 1 |
| Message | We would have been happy to support this if it could have passed - but we will have to join the "no" bandwagon for now. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 29 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 62 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 9 |
| Random fact: Particracy has 464 player slots. |
| Random quote: "Men are so simple and so much inclined to obey immediate needs that a deceiver will never lack victims for his deceptions." - Niccolo Machiavelli |