We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Bill for the Security of the People of Hobrazia
Details
Submitted by[?]: Hobrazian Federalist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2482
Description[?]:
The people have long been put under the domination of the Second Imperial Republic. Before this was simply the Imperial Republic, the start of the tyrannical viewpoint of the Gauls which continues to this day. Therefore, the Anti-Gaulist Alliance proposes this bill. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Eminent Domain.
Old value:: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Current: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Proposed: The government may not seize private property.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The appointment of mayors.
Old value:: The municipal councils exercise mayoral powers.
Current: Citizens elect their mayor directly in a local election.
Proposed: Citizens elect their mayor directly in a local election.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Renewable energy sources (eg. solar power, wind power).
Old value:: Government subsidies are provided for research and generation of energy through renewable sources.
Current: Government subsidies are provided for research and generation of energy through renewable sources.
Proposed: The government does not take any position with regards to renewable energy.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 16:38:54, November 07, 2007 CET | From | Hobrazian Federalist Party | To | Debating the Bill for the Security of the People of Hobrazia |
Message | Typical anti-people pro-tyranny viewpoints move throughout Hobrazia. |
Date | 23:53:17, November 07, 2007 CET | From | We Say So! Party | To | Debating the Bill for the Security of the People of Hobrazia |
Message | Typical conspiracy claptrap finding fear in their own shadow. If this Country was was so tyrannical do our right honourable colleagues believe that their Party would still be in existence? |
Date | 07:17:11, November 08, 2007 CET | From | Hobrazian Federalist Party | To | Debating the Bill for the Security of the People of Hobrazia |
Message | The Anti-Gaulist Alliance holds the view that the Gauls have, and will continue the façade of "democracy" in order to not allow the citizens to rise up against them. It in this case that the citizens must be freed again. The legislative actions of the AGA will pave a road for a just society built upon the people, and not the Gauls nor their puppets. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes | Total Seats: 26 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 284 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 90 |
Random fact: Dorvik is a nation based on Germanic and old Prussian cultures, it is located on the far north of Artania, making it an almost arctic nation. |
Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia) |