Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 00:16:51
Server time: 19:43:08, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): itsmenotme | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of July 2482

Details

Submitted by[?]: National Centrist Coalition

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2483

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:11:26, November 07, 2007 CET
FromNational Centrist Coalition
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2482
MessageFinally

Date18:18:19, November 07, 2007 CET
FromChristian Communist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2482
MessageWe will get behind this

Date18:18:42, November 07, 2007 CET
FromChristian Communist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2482
MessageThough we feel the GLPF should be included too

Date20:29:04, November 07, 2007 CET
FromChristian Communist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2482
MessageOn second thought we feel the NCC has too much power in relation to its size we will suport if some of their ministries are given to the GLPF

Date20:40:26, November 07, 2007 CET
FromEhre und Treue
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2482
MessageIt seems that the CEL doesn't think much of its principles, abandoning them for power the moment it seems possible.

Date21:17:34, November 07, 2007 CET
FromCivic and Economic Liberty
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2482
MessageIn what way would that be, dearest EUT? Thirst for power can most appropriately be an accusation against the Imperial Party which vetoed our majority cabinet. You supported them, since you were afraid of losing your cushy cabinet seats. We will support any cabinet which reflects the will of the majority of H&GSans.

Date17:28:58, November 08, 2007 CET
FromEhre und Treue
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2482
MessageIt is in no way the duty of a democratic party to do anything that reflects the will of the majority of the people. If it were so, you could as well just have a direct democracy and not vote for parties. And you don't vote for a party in the hope that it will do what seems best to the people, but in the hope that it will stick to its principles and do what it's promised, and because of what you've voted vor it.

Also, we support the IMP because of our loyalty to the House of Rothringen, which we will maintain in all matters of consitutional politics.

But ask yourself this: Did the people of Hulstria vote for you in order to see you forming a coalition where communists are in command of Justice and Internal Affairs?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 152

no
      

Total Seats: 348

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Particracy isn't just a game, it also has a forum, where players meet up to discuss role-playing, talk about in-game stuff, run their own newspaper or organisation and even discuss non-game and real-life issues! Check it out: http://forum.particracy.net/

    Random quote: "What difference does it make to the dead, the orphans, and the homeless, whether the mad destruction is wrought under the name of totalitarianism or the holy name of liberty and democracy?" - Mahatma Gandhi.

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 58