Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5481
Next month in: 00:53:45
Server time: 23:06:14, May 10, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): R Drax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Nationalisation of the defense forces.

Details

Submitted by[?]: Communist Party of Hobrazia

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2486

Description[?]:

This proposal is to nationalise all our defense industries in order to ensure that all of our national defense is controlled by the state rather than corporations working only for profit no matter how heavily they are regulated.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:30:25, November 11, 2007 CET
FromWe Say So! Party
ToDebating the Nationalisation of the defense forces.
MessageWe do not accept this. Whilst we understand the reasoning behind our right honourable colleagues stance we feel that the advantages provided by the operation of both public and private defence industries provide the best way of providing good product with innovation and cost effective provision of equipment. Private industry is capable of pouring huge sums of money into innovation which the public sector cannot afford allowing Hobrazia to operate modern military equipment, whilst the public sector does a superb job of providing specialist equipment and maintaining existing equipment to a high standard.
Each can provide better and more efficient services in differing areas. Having both available to the government allows us to gain from each sector much more readily than a single provision alone.

Date17:30:36, November 12, 2007 CET
FromHobrazian Federalist Party
ToDebating the Nationalisation of the defense forces.
MessageThis is another attempt by the Communist party to divert the power of the people into the power of the organizations of tyranny which exist throughout the land.

Date19:02:55, November 12, 2007 CET
FromCommunist Party of Hobrazia
ToDebating the Nationalisation of the defense forces.
MessageSo the Anti-Gaulist Alliance believe that Hobrazia's democratically elected goverment are the organisations of tyranny, a goverment they themselves are a part of. What a wonderful message to present to their voters.

Date22:15:31, November 14, 2007 CET
FromHobrazian Federalist Party
ToDebating the Nationalisation of the defense forces.
MessageWe are to rip apart the beast from the inside.

Date23:40:03, November 14, 2007 CET
FromCommunist Party of Hobrazia
ToDebating the Nationalisation of the defense forces.
MessageSo you wish to destroy Hobrazia's democraticly elected goverment. That makes you a traitor to your country and an enemy of the people. We agree that the system isn't perfect but the destruction of democracy is a violation of the rights of the people who, you must remember put you in the position you are in today. This makes you not only a hypocrypt but also a danger to society.

Date21:24:18, November 15, 2007 CET
FromPartai Komunis Hobrazia
ToDebating the Nationalisation of the defense forces.
MessagePerhaps you do not understand the A-GA's intentions. They wish to end the government and let the people decide for themselves as they wish. As they are democractically elected to do so, it is not treason.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 0

no
   

Total Seats: 162

abstain
    

Total Seats: 238


Random fact: The voters enjoy active parties who take upon themselves the initiative to create laws.

Random quote: "An independent is someone who wants to take the politics out of politics." - Adlai Stevenson

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 62