We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: The National Tap Water Act of 2484
Details
Submitted by[?]: Démocrates de la Gauche
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2485
Description[?]:
| Article 1 Click here to remove this proposal. Proposal[?] to change Regulation of the quality of drinking water. Old value:: Local government is responsible for drinking water quality regulation. Current: Local government is responsible for drinking water quality regulation. Proposed: The government sets a single standard to ensure all tap water is drinkable. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Regulation of the quality of drinking water.
Old value:: Local government is responsible for drinking water quality regulation.
Current: Local government is responsible for drinking water quality regulation.
Proposed: The government sets a single standard to ensure all tap water is drinkable.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:28:19, November 12, 2007 CET | From |  Socialist Jelbanian Party-D.L.J.-D.L.F | To | Debating the The National Tap Water Act of 2484 |
| Message | we strongly support |
| Date | 21:41:08, November 12, 2007 CET | From | Démocrates de la Gauche | To | Debating the The National Tap Water Act of 2484 |
| Message | Bottom line. We need to ensure that Jelbania is drinking safe water that is free of water borne dieseases. |
| Date | 02:55:08, November 13, 2007 CET | From | Démocrates de la Gauche | To | Debating the The National Tap Water Act of 2484 |
| Message | Opposing this why UCC? I can see the Goons opposing this they have no common sense. OOC: and they are only here to be dumb and ruin a country's game. |
| Date | 04:07:29, November 13, 2007 CET | From | Centre Démocratique | To | Debating the The National Tap Water Act of 2484 |
| Message | We wish to keep this a local matter and not a national one. |
| Date | 07:08:55, November 13, 2007 CET | From | Démocrates de la Gauche | To | Debating the The National Tap Water Act of 2484 |
| Message | Why it's either you have clean water or dirty water? And clean water sounds a little better than dirty water don't you think? We are localist because of the difference of ideals throughout the country but this should be a one deal thing. |
| Date | 01:31:17, November 14, 2007 CET | From | Centre Démocratique | To | Debating the The National Tap Water Act of 2484 |
| Message | Just because local governments regulate the quality of drinking water does not automatically ensure that it would be dirty. |
| Date | 01:39:24, November 14, 2007 CET | From | Démocrates de la Gauche | To | Debating the The National Tap Water Act of 2484 |
| Message | I never said that, however there should be a national standard for everyone to have clean water. It is an option of local governments to let go the standard of water in a local community due to shortage of funds, if the central government ensures that all the water would be clean, than that's an issue that the local government won't have to worry about. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 50 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 50 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Moderation reserves the discretion to declare RP laws invalid if the players supporting them are doing so in an excessively confrontational way. |
| Random quote: "And what is Aleppo?" - Gary Johnson |