We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Family Court Devolution Bill of 2484
Details
Submitted by[?]: Democratic Rationalists (PrCoa)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2485
Description[?]:
| A bill to devolve family court decisions to local governments. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The legality of divorces (if marriages are recognised).
Old value:: Divorces are legal, be it mutual consent, grounded cause or if one partner wants it.
Current: Divorces are legal, be it mutual consent, grounded cause or if one partner wants it.
Proposed: Divorces are prohibited.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 15:30:49, November 12, 2007 CET | From | Democratic Rationalists (PrCoa) | To | Debating the Family Court Devolution Bill of 2484 |
| Message | Family court decisions are properly left to provincial governments, not the national government. While DRs agree in principle that divorce should be available, we agree more that the federal government shouldn't mandate to the provinces what their courts should do in family matters. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 289 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 307 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 104 |
| Random fact: Unless otherwise stated, monarchs and their royal houses will be presumed to be owned by the player who introduced the bill appointing them to their position. |
| Random quote: "Up against the corporate government, voters find themselves asked to choose between look-alike candidates from two parties vying to see who takes the marching orders from their campaign paymasters and their future employers. The money of vested interest nullifies genuine voter choice and trust." - Ralph Nader |