Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5475
Next month in: 03:12:47
Server time: 08:47:12, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): AethanKal | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Luxery Tax Relief

Details

Submitted by[?]: Rightist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2486

Description[?]:

TBD

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date07:03:25, November 13, 2007 CET
FromShaman's Voice
ToDebating the Luxery Tax Relief
MessageWe are unsure about this. What is the point of this bill?

Date07:22:45, November 13, 2007 CET
FromJudicial Union Party
ToDebating the Luxery Tax Relief
MessageYet, your party opposed when we proposed such a move...

Date12:43:37, November 13, 2007 CET
FromGreenish Liberal Democratic Socialists
ToDebating the Luxery Tax Relief
MessageMeh

Date14:37:55, November 13, 2007 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the Luxery Tax Relief
MessageLets take a look at your bill shall we JUP?

You proposed a 7% cut in luxery tax. That was unacceptable. This is a 2% cut. Which is acceptable.

Date12:07:57, November 14, 2007 CET
FromJudicial Union Party
ToDebating the Luxery Tax Relief
MessageOur bill addressed the current needs of this nation. We proposed the rate based on the required income from the luxury tax. The Rightist Party apparently chooses numbers out of the clouds.

The word is luxury. "Luxery" is not a word.

Date14:24:49, November 14, 2007 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the Luxery Tax Relief
MessageAnd a day when a person picks on another speling means that person has zero argment.

*misspellings intentional*

Date06:47:09, November 15, 2007 CET
FromJudicial Union Party
ToDebating the Luxery Tax Relief
MessageYet you didn't change the spellings in the bill. How stubborn.

Date20:47:57, November 15, 2007 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the Luxery Tax Relief
MessageJust like you who wants a tax cut and then votes against one.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 151

no
     

Total Seats: 348

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: There is a phpBB forum dedicated to Particracy. Please click the Forum link in the top game menu. Additions to the game, suggestions and discussion is held there so get involved. http://forum.particracy.net/

Random quote: "The activist is not the man who says the river is dirty. The activist is the man who cleans up the river." - Ross Perot

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 61