Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5475
Next month in: 02:06:35
Server time: 05:53:24, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): R Drax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: No Nuclear Weapon Development

Details

Submitted by[?]: Pithy Party-Liberty League

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2486

Description[?]:

It is a waste of money to develop nuclear weapons if we cannot use them. Also, this will bring nuclear weapons policy in line with biological and chemical weapons policy.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:20:54, November 13, 2007 CET
FromGuds og Konges Kjemprene
ToDebating the No Nuclear Weapon Development
MessageThen we'd rather change the B and C weapons policy. It is important for us to know all about nuclear weaponry, not in order to produce them, but in order to protect ourselves from them. Just because we won't use them, others won't cease to.

Date18:46:00, November 13, 2007 CET
FromPertetuum Kazulia
ToDebating the No Nuclear Weapon Development
MessageWe agree with GOKK

Date20:29:25, November 13, 2007 CET
FromCSA Communist Party of the DPRK
ToDebating the No Nuclear Weapon Development
Messageyah killing civilations to save oyurself is really elffish

Date21:56:30, November 13, 2007 CET
FromGuds og Konges Kjemprene
ToDebating the No Nuclear Weapon Development
MessageThat last post of the LSP is utterly senseless. We'd like them to explain.

Date23:32:33, November 13, 2007 CET
FromCSA Communist Party of the DPRK
ToDebating the No Nuclear Weapon Development
MessageI'm saying, to kill inncent people in order to win a war is selffish

Date03:20:16, November 14, 2007 CET
FromPithy Party-Liberty League
ToDebating the No Nuclear Weapon Development
MessageIs it possible to research nuclear defense mechanisms without researching how to build nukes themselves?

Date11:45:40, November 14, 2007 CET
FromGuds og Konges Kjemprene
ToDebating the No Nuclear Weapon Development
MessageIs it necessary not to know how to build nukes in order to not build them?

Date17:42:59, November 14, 2007 CET
FromCSA Communist Party of the DPRK
ToDebating the No Nuclear Weapon Development
Messagewe understand, we are now changing are vote to no.

Date21:57:53, November 14, 2007 CET
FromPithy Party-Liberty League
ToDebating the No Nuclear Weapon Development
MessageNo, but it still costs a lot of money and resources to research nukes. As I see it, this bill would still allow us to research ways to stop nukes.

Date23:44:44, November 14, 2007 CET
FromCSA Communist Party of the DPRK
ToDebating the No Nuclear Weapon Development
Messageagain lol, we are now voting yes :P

Date02:41:34, November 15, 2007 CET
FromPertetuum Kazulia
ToDebating the No Nuclear Weapon Development
MessageNuclear weapon research is vital for progress of nuclear science in all fields, including, indeed, the possibility to make more powerful, effective bombs in the case a foreign power forces us into a nuclear war.

Date18:38:48, November 15, 2007 CET
FromCSA Communist Party of the DPRK
ToDebating the No Nuclear Weapon Development
Messageto kill civilans to save yourself is selffish

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 164

no
    

Total Seats: 526

abstain
  

Total Seats: 60


Random fact: Submitting a bill without any proposals in it will not attract or detract voters. It will not raise your visibility or change your political position.

Random quote: "Fascism is capitalism plus murder." - Upton Sinclair

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 68