Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5460
Next month in: 03:11:49
Server time: 12:48:10, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Brazil25 | h48191 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Military Reform

Details

Submitted by[?]: National Atheist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2489

Description[?]:

Some changes proposed by the Nationalist Party.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:52:47, November 15, 2007 CET
FromNational Atheist Party
ToDebating the Military Reform
MessageTimothy Carpenter, Candidate for Minister of Defence: "Women are inferior to men pyshically, they will also cause a distraction. We need our soldiers to be focused and strong."

The Candidate for Prime Minister, Thomas Arthur apolagised for the sexist comment and said: "In times of war we can never know who our enemy will be. If they do not take the same stance of POWs as us... Then women could become vistims of rape. This bill would be for their own protection. We also believe that if the nation is in severe danger then conscription may be neccassary."

Date19:37:54, November 15, 2007 CET
FromParti de Garde Royales
ToDebating the Military Reform
MessageThe OGP supports none of these ventures. First, why should the state control industries who make weapons or what ever - such enterprises are better left to the private sector, as state run coorporations are often less effective. Second, we believe is war is declared it would be too late to teach our poeple to fight and send them to war, furthermore we do not wish to send pacifists and other reluctants into war. Third, we will not compromise women's rights - if they want to fight for their country in the field, so be it.

Sen. Castanier de Villement

Date22:44:47, November 15, 2007 CET
FromLourenne Democratic Party
ToDebating the Military Reform
MessageWe share the concerns of the OGP and as I have myself served a term in the military, I personally think the first article is a joke.

Sen. Daiana Campeanu (D - KU)

Date01:18:12, November 16, 2007 CET
FromDemocratic & socialist Party (PDyS)
ToDebating the Military Reform
MessageThe PDyS can´t aprove this bill, it´s a backward movement in civil right.


Sen. Iván Benítez. G.S. of PDyS

Date05:51:26, November 18, 2007 CET
FromPeople's Anarchist Union
ToDebating the Military Reform
MessageThe DPP supports none of the provisions of this bill.

Date23:26:11, November 19, 2007 CET
FromProgressive Party
ToDebating the Military Reform
Message"We have worked hard to make the army of the nation one of the best in the world, we will not allow prejudice and intolerance change that."

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 24

no
      

Total Seats: 158

abstain
 

Total Seats: 18


Random fact: It is possible for a player to transfer ownership of a character or a royal house to another player. This should be done in a public way, such as on the Character Transfers thread, so that if a dispute arises in the future, Moderation can be pointed towards evidence of the transfer.

Random quote: "One of the greatest delusions in the world is the hope that the evils in this world are to be cured by legislation." - Thomas B. Reed

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 82