We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Protection of Private Property
Details
Submitted by[?]: Socialist Liberal Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2101
Description[?]:
A bill to ensure that the government respects the right for private property to exist without interference from the state. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Eminent Domain.
Old value:: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Current: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Proposed: The government may not seize private property.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 12:47:45, August 25, 2005 CET | From | Alorian Socialist Party | To | Debating the Protection of Private Property |
Message | No, we oppose this and with good reason, people recieve compensation for land lost so while moving may be a bit of a hassle they wont actually lose anything. However if we cannot gain control of land, how are we going to be able to build new roads, powerplants, factories, parks. We cannot manage our country if we allow landholders to be immobile. This will also directly benifit the rich land owners of society, by making them "untouchables", the poor need housing and the country needs infrastucture, this will hold back devolopment! |
Date | 23:45:17, August 25, 2005 CET | From | Socialist Liberal Party | To | Debating the Protection of Private Property |
Message | Mr. Speaker, Private property is not the ownership of the state. I believe the government is here to serve the people, not to control them. It horrifies me that a fellow socialist party can stand here before the house and oppose this legislation. This legislation seeks to establish government regulations to say that the government has no right to sieze people's homes and livlihoods.Aloria has enough space to build on without the government's tyrannous ability to destroy people's lives. |
Date | 13:29:46, August 26, 2005 CET | From | Alorian Socialist Party | To | Debating the Protection of Private Property |
Message | Comrade I stand by the fact that peoples lives are not destroyed, they are adequately compensated by this goverment should their land be required for special goverment projects like infrastructure. One cannot put the individual above the needs of the many, this could hold back the development of Aloria! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 301 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 15 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 81 |
Random fact: Did you know you can change the official name of your nation? All you need to do is draw up a new name that is in accordance with the Nation Renaming Guide, pass a bill proposing the name change with a two-thirds majority and then post a request to Moderation on the "Renaming Requests" thread. You can change city and region names in this way too. |
Random quote: "Fascism is a religion. The twentieth century will be known in history as the century of fascism." - Benito Mussolini |