Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 4316
Next month in: 01:08:59
Server time: 18:51:00, December 12, 2017 CET
Currently online (17): AdrianUrbina | armless_raptor | baggington | Cirithi | dharr001 | Eddie123 | EdmundSB5 | Francois Victorieux | Gates6 | Kast28 | Kri | marc6788 | nicepigeon | Phil Piratin | RubenPT | Sultek_ | Yan | Record: 63 on 23:28:53, August 06, 2007 CET

Bill: Protection of Private Property

Details

Submitted by[?]: Socialist Liberal Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2101

Description[?]:

A bill to ensure that the government respects the right for private property to exist without interference from the state.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date12:47:45, August 25, 2005 CET
FromAlorian Socialist Party
ToDebating the Protection of Private Property
MessageNo, we oppose this and with good reason, people recieve compensation for land lost so while moving may be a bit of a hassle they wont actually lose anything. However if we cannot gain control of land, how are we going to be able to build new roads, powerplants, factories, parks. We cannot manage our country if we allow landholders to be immobile.
This will also directly benifit the rich land owners of society, by making them "untouchables", the poor need housing and the country needs infrastucture, this will hold back devolopment!

Date23:45:17, August 25, 2005 CET
FromSocialist Liberal Party
ToDebating the Protection of Private Property
MessageMr. Speaker,
Private property is not the ownership of the state. I believe the government is here to serve the people, not to control them. It horrifies me that a fellow socialist party can stand here before the house and oppose this legislation.

This legislation seeks to establish government regulations to say that the government has no right to sieze people's homes and livlihoods.Aloria has enough space to build on without the government's tyrannous ability to destroy people's lives.

Date13:29:46, August 26, 2005 CET
FromAlorian Socialist Party
ToDebating the Protection of Private Property
MessageComrade
I stand by the fact that peoples lives are not destroyed, they are adequately compensated by this goverment should their land be required for special goverment projects like infrastructure.
One cannot put the individual above the needs of the many, this could hold back the development of Aloria!

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 301

no
 

Total Seats: 15

abstain
   

Total Seats: 81


Random fact: If you have a question, post it on the forum. Game Moderators and other players will be happy to help you. http://forum.particracy.net/

Random quote: "What are you trying to protect heterosexual marriages from? There isn't a limited amount of love in Iowa. It isn't a non-renewable resource. If Amy and Barbara or Mike and Steve love each other, it doesn't mean that John and Mary can't." Ed Fallon

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 49