Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 4412
Next month in: 03:54:24
Server time: 12:05:35, June 21, 2018 CET
Currently online (6): ManagerDan | Nicholas22222 | PolarisEcho | Ruscomrad | Sisyphus | SkinnerBenn | Record: 63 on 23:28:53, August 06, 2007 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Protection of Private Property


Submitted by[?]: Socialist Liberal Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2101


A bill to ensure that the government respects the right for private property to exist without interference from the state.



These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date12:47:45, August 25, 2005 CET
FromAlorian Socialist Party
ToDebating the Protection of Private Property
MessageNo, we oppose this and with good reason, people recieve compensation for land lost so while moving may be a bit of a hassle they wont actually lose anything. However if we cannot gain control of land, how are we going to be able to build new roads, powerplants, factories, parks. We cannot manage our country if we allow landholders to be immobile.
This will also directly benifit the rich land owners of society, by making them "untouchables", the poor need housing and the country needs infrastucture, this will hold back devolopment!

Date23:45:17, August 25, 2005 CET
FromSocialist Liberal Party
ToDebating the Protection of Private Property
MessageMr. Speaker,
Private property is not the ownership of the state. I believe the government is here to serve the people, not to control them. It horrifies me that a fellow socialist party can stand here before the house and oppose this legislation.

This legislation seeks to establish government regulations to say that the government has no right to sieze people's homes and livlihoods.Aloria has enough space to build on without the government's tyrannous ability to destroy people's lives.

Date13:29:46, August 26, 2005 CET
FromAlorian Socialist Party
ToDebating the Protection of Private Property
I stand by the fact that peoples lives are not destroyed, they are adequately compensated by this goverment should their land be required for special goverment projects like infrastructure.
One cannot put the individual above the needs of the many, this could hold back the development of Aloria!

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe


Vote Seats

Total Seats: 301


Total Seats: 15


Total Seats: 81

Random fact: "Party sitters" can be inactivated upon request. Players who, over a prolonged period (usually meaning a minimum of 3 IG years/6 RL days) are just logging in but not voting on bills or contributing to debates, will be judged to be essentially not playing the game. The player requesting the inactivation should cite this rule when doing so.

Random quote: "The day is not far off when the economic problem will take the back seat where it belongs, and the arena of the heart and the head will be occupied or reoccupied, by our real problems—the problems of life and of human relations, of creation and behavior and religion." – John Maynard Keynes

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 49