Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 00:37:03
Server time: 19:22:56, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): AR Drax | ChevaldelaMer | Mindus | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Administration Reforms

Details

Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2491

Description[?]:

Okay, I believe a few things within our administration need to change. Among those things are things such as the total number of seats, our logo, names and some other things. Please at least consider these before shooting them down.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date16:28:01, November 21, 2007 CET
From Conservative Party
ToDebating the Administration Reforms
MessageOkay, you will notice them and most likely a majority will deny them. However you will notice many of them are not major changes, only small ones: the national motto for example. This is to show that we are all for change when it does eventually come around, and we would like people to please accept these proposals for the good of Rutania.

Date16:28:40, November 21, 2007 CET
From Conservative Party
ToDebating the Administration Reforms
MessageAs another note, many of these are positive things for parties: you will be able to hold more quotas, include more proposals and such. There is nothing detrimental here.

Date17:18:14, November 21, 2007 CET
From New Liberal Party
ToDebating the Administration Reforms
MessageI haven't come across any party that has maxed out their proposals on the old system? Do we need the change?

I like the Phoenix but I really think our Motto is un-inspiring. Liberty and Equality are noble pursuits but Technology? Not very poetic :)

Date20:55:35, November 21, 2007 CET
From Conservative Party
ToDebating the Administration Reforms
MessageIndeed, but I didn't believe the rest of the parties would wish to change from technology. If it were my choice it would include honour or something similar to fit with Liberty and Equality, but majority rules i'm afraid. Proposals have been maxed by previous parties, which is why we should increase it, to give others a chance to make sure they don't max out: it might not be totally needed, but then again it's not exactly got any reason to vote against it now has it?

Date12:20:15, November 22, 2007 CET
From Neo-Epicurean Party
ToDebating the Administration Reforms
MessageAs the oldest currently active party, let me share some history behind the current settings.

We used to have a limit of 50 proposals, but some parties started "spamming" the legislature with bills and the number was reduced to cut down on the annoyance. I think that the current quota is reasonable. I have gone up to my limit a few times while trying to define my platform, but it doesn't take long to get the proposals back.

The motto was proposed by the Deus Ex Machina party, a party composed of Artificial Intelligences. The change was passed when the cabinet was dominated by goon parties. I believe that the manatee was made the national animal during the same round of legislation.

The number of seats has been 750 for a long time; really there is no pro or con to this other than aesthetics. Seats are still assigned proportionally. I would actually like to see a much smaller number of seats, like 99 (an odd number to prevent possible ties), but the effect on each party's influence is the same.

Date13:11:22, November 22, 2007 CET
From Conservative Party
ToDebating the Administration Reforms
MessageThe motto could do with a change, so let's hear some suggestions. Also, the party seat could well be brought down further, whilst I can leave the proposals idea alone I suppose. Any suggestions for changing the bill then?

Date17:51:52, November 22, 2007 CET
From Neo-Epicurean Party
ToDebating the Administration Reforms
MessageIf we still want to have a tripartite motto, I like "Wisdom, Honor, Courage".

Date21:18:01, November 22, 2007 CET
From Conservative Party
ToDebating the Administration Reforms
MessageI've edited the Bill with some changes. Should we go to a vote now?

Date03:22:19, November 23, 2007 CET
From Neo-Epicurean Party
ToDebating the Administration Reforms
MessageSounds good to me.

Date09:24:15, November 23, 2007 CET
From Hellenic Imperial Party
ToDebating the Administration Reforms
MessageI always like one I came up with "Prospathia yia tin Irini"...Greek for "Striving for Peace".
But I like Wisdom, Honor, Courage".

Date15:39:12, November 23, 2007 CET
From Anarcho-Capitalist Party
ToDebating the Administration Reforms
MessageMy only concern is with the exclamation point at the end of the motto.

Date21:30:29, November 23, 2007 CET
From Conservative Party
ToDebating the Administration Reforms
MessageExclamation point removed, now we go to vote.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
      

Total Seats: 750

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
      

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Party candidates for head of state elections are not visible to the public. This means that you cannot see who will run and who will not, which adds another strategic element to the elections.

    Random quote: "The experience of ages has shown that a man who works on the land is purer, nobler, higher, and more moral... Agriculture should be at the basis of everything." - Mikuláš Gogolský, former Deltarian writer

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 76