We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Removing the Military from Everyday Life
Details
Submitted by[?]: Söhne der Freiheit
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2490
Description[?]:
A bill to establish a healthy separation of the military from the police force and to eliminate coercion by the government to serve. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's policy on the separation of the police and the military.
Old value:: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Current: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Proposed: A civilian police force is in place and the military is not allowed to play any part in it.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change National service.
Old value:: All adults upon completion of schooling must serve a term of civilian national service.
Current: There shall be no mandatory military or civilian national service.
Proposed: There shall be no mandatory military or civilian national service.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 21:04:07, November 21, 2007 CET | From | AM Radical Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Removing the Military from Everyday Life |
Message | Article 1 is philosophicaly sound, but in the event of natural disaster or major crisis, the assistance of the military woucl be very useful. Article 2 we are in agreement with. |
Date | 21:22:42, November 21, 2007 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Removing the Military from Everyday Life |
Message | Article one is dangerous and destructive. In dangerous times, the FRP chooses to weaken the police force. We are well on our way to feeling it necessary to add the FRP to the list of impeachments. Article two is even worse. Perhaps the greatest reason for the security of our sovereign nation, is the fact that our entire adult population counts as a standing army... yet again, the FRP seems intent on betraying national security in the interests of some undeclared (and visibly treasonous?) agenda. |
Date | 08:22:20, November 22, 2007 CET | From | Kapitalist-Arbeitsfamilien Partei | To | Debating the Removing the Military from Everyday Life |
Message | We STRONGLY support Article 2; any sort of draft amounts to nothing more than GOVERNMENTAL SLAVERY!!! |
Date | 09:07:26, November 22, 2007 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Removing the Military from Everyday Life |
Message | We wish the CWFP would tone down their hysteria. Calling our domestic 'civilian national service' slavery is an insult to the victims of REAL slavery. |
Date | 18:03:56, November 22, 2007 CET | From | Kapitalist-Arbeitsfamilien Partei | To | Debating the Removing the Military from Everyday Life |
Message | Drang, look up the word "Slavery" and/or "involuntary servitude" in a standard Likatonian Dictonary. If you do, you would notice that slavery is the definition of a person being FORCED to do something against his/her will. If it is at the hands of a plantation owner or private citizen, that is fascism; if it is at the hands of a Government, that is a police state. We don't care WHO is giving the orders b/c we believe in freedom from BOTH!!!! |
Date | 19:00:47, November 22, 2007 CET | From | Democratic Workers' Party and CTUL List | To | Debating the Removing the Military from Everyday Life |
Message | Actually, we don't see how it is only Fascism when at the hands of an individual. The origin of the word revolves around state control.... |
Date | 07:39:21, November 23, 2007 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Removing the Military from Everyday Life |
Message | Fascism means 'unity'. It doesn't connect to slavery at all. The CWFP are... well, being the CWFP. That is their crime - it is also their punishment. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 318 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 237 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 111 |
Random fact: Party candidates for head of state elections are not visible to the public. This means that you cannot see who will run and who will not, which adds another strategic element to the elections. |
Random quote: "The strongest reason for people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." - Thomas Jefferson |