We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Alcohol Rederegulation Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Liberal League
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2492
Description[?]:
| To clean up the mess the ARF made by undoing the SP's progress. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy towards alcoholic beverages.
Old value:: Alcoholic beverages may be purchased and consumed anywhere, but only by adults.
Current: Alcoholic beverages may be purchased only from licensed sales outlets, and can only be available to adults.
Proposed: Alcoholic beverage regulations are not imposed by the government.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 05:00:15, November 27, 2007 CET | From |  National Liberal League | To | Debating the Alcohol Rederegulation Act |
| Message | it might have been that one Party for Freedom and Democracy or whatever, but, you know. Same point. |
| Date | 05:27:21, November 27, 2007 CET | From | Rewolucyjna Partia Socjalistyczna | To | Debating the Alcohol Rederegulation Act |
| Message | I think a minimum of regulation on this point is necessary, but at the same time this is a fairly minor issue in the grand scheme of things. Workers Power is abstaining for now until a greater internal consensus is reached. |
| Date | 05:58:28, November 27, 2007 CET | From | National Liberal League | To | Debating the Alcohol Rederegulation Act |
| Message | Hmm. The current law takes away any right for a parent to let their kid have just some wine or anything, if I interpret it correctly. I think the age limit is best used as chosen by a familial structure... not by arbitrary governmental means. |
| Date | 21:26:59, November 27, 2007 CET | From | Rewolucyjna Partia Socjalistyczna | To | Debating the Alcohol Rederegulation Act |
| Message | That does make a fair amount of sense. I've always taken for granted that things like that would be implicitly left out of a law like this, as the privacy of one's own home is somewhat different from the public sphere. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 235 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 82 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 16 |
| Random fact: There is a phpBB forum dedicated to Particracy. Please click the Forum link in the top game menu. Additions to the game, suggestions and discussion is held there so get involved. http://forum.particracy.net/ |
| Random quote: "I have a dream that one day, down in Alabama, with its vicious racists, with its governor having his lips dripping with the words of interposition and nullification; one day right there in Alabama, little black boys and black girls will be able to join hands with little white boys and white girls as sisters and brothers." - Martin Luther King Jr. |