We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Liberation of the Proposition of a Cabinet
Details
Submitted by[?]: Luthori Tory Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2493
Description[?]:
| (OOC: It can be much more fun if more than one party can propose a cabinet.) |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The constitutional right and responsibility to propose a cabinet to the legislature.
Old value:: Only the Head of State can propose a cabinet coalition.
Current: Each party can propose a cabinet coalition.
Proposed: Each party can propose a cabinet coalition.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:28:23, November 27, 2007 CET | From | Falanges Party | To | Debating the Liberation of the Proposition of a Cabinet |
| Message | We have proposed such proposal in the past (when we created 2 postions: Viceroy and Chief Privy Coucellor). But most parties in the Empire refused it and prefered that only the Viceroy can propse cabinets, in order for the Viceroy to have a significant role, so we prefer to keep the possibility of proposing cabinet given of to the Viceroy. |
| Date | 23:50:17, November 27, 2007 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the Liberation of the Proposition of a Cabinet |
| Message | We're with the CDNC here: what's the point in choosing a Viceroy if they don't have any power? The only alternative we would consider to the status quo would be for the Viceroy to chair the cabinet again, and any party can propose cabinets, as this gives the Viceroy a veto. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 91 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 52 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 32 |
| Random fact: "OOC", "IC" and "IG" are commonly-used acronyms in Particracy. "OOC" refers to comments, discussions and actions which are out-of-character, meaning they are done player-to-player rather than party-to-party. "IC" refers to in-character interactions (ie. party-to-party). Similarly, "IG" means in-game, although this term may also simply refer to what happens in the actual game interface, as opposed to on the forum or elsewhere. "RP" just means "role-play". |
| Random quote: "When I see a 9/11 victim family on television, or whatever, I'm just like, "Oh shut up" I'm so sick of them because they're always complaining." - Glenn Beck |