We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Segregation Ban Act of 2492
Details
Submitted by[?]: Ordoliberal Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2493
Description[?]:
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Racial segregation of public amenities (eg. drinking fountains, public toilets)
Old value:: All public amenities are segregated.
Current: Segregation of any public amenity is banned.
Proposed: Segregation of any public amenity is banned.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 10:54:06, November 28, 2007 CET | From | Pro Grain Club | To | Debating the Segregation Ban Act of 2492 |
| Message | Absolutely and about time. |
| Date | 17:28:12, November 28, 2007 CET | From | Fascist Zealotry League | To | Debating the Segregation Ban Act of 2492 |
| Message | Time to start looking for a private swimming pool I think. God! Can you imagine sharing the same water as a dirty Yokel bastard fresh from the field? What a horrible thought! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 574 | |||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 134 | |||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "Socialists like to tout their confiscation and redistribution schemes as noble and caring, but we should ask if theft is ever noble or caring." - Robert Hawes |