Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5475
Next month in: 00:04:27
Server time: 07:55:32, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): luthorian3059 | Xalvas | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Infrastructure Reform Act #1

Details

Submitted by[?]: Kapitalist-Arbeitsfamilien Partei

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2494

Description[?]:

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date07:06:38, November 29, 2007 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the Infrastructure Reform Act #1
MessageWe see no advantage to this, and only disadvantages.

Date07:17:16, November 29, 2007 CET
FromPermissive Social Union
ToDebating the Infrastructure Reform Act #1
MessageGod no.

Date07:20:27, November 29, 2007 CET
FromPermissive Social Union
ToDebating the Infrastructure Reform Act #1
MessageAs the grid is publicly owned by by the state on behalf of - at least tenuously - the working masses, what compensation will be given to them if the power stations are sold off?. This forcible re-distribution of wealth was something we assumed was something the CWFP was very much against? You know, distributing wealth because the government demands it?

Date13:57:42, November 29, 2007 CET
FromKapitalist-Arbeitsfamilien Partei
ToDebating the Infrastructure Reform Act #1
Message
Can someone please explain what "disadvantages" will come from this bill???

On the contrary, it will BENEFIT the people.

Case in point: under the currently law, the Government has a MONOPOLY over electrical energy production since it owns the ENTIRE grid!!!

According to "Economics 101" that is taught at Immerence University in St. Vodinsberg, this means that there is NO COMPETITION in the market (since Government owns everything). However, since the sources of electrical energy (oil, coal, water, hydrogen, potatoes, ethanol, biodiesel, etccc) are LIMITED in number by nature, this means that in order to efficiently allocate the energy resources, electricity has to be RATIONED or the PRICE has to SKYROCKET on poor and middle class consumers. In addition, the State will have to "cut" the energy---thus ***diminishing*** the QUALITY---in order to cut costs.

In a nutshell, anytime there is a MONOPOLY on a good or service, this means that there are only 3 possible results:

(1) The Price will SKYROCKET;

(2) There will be RATIONING of critical energy resources;

(3) The Quality will DIMINISH;

***********************************************************************************************************************
Therefore, the most EFFICIENT solution would be to allow MULTIPLE private companies to own a "piece" of the grid and electrical energy; This will lead to COMPETITION.

Case in Point:

(1) Company A produces the BEST quality of electricity and energy but their price is EXPENSIVE!!!

(2) Therefore, what do you think Company B who has a lower quality electricity going to do to COMPETE for these millions of Likath profits??? That's right: they will drastically CUT their price to make it cheaper than Company A in order to get a higher market share and profit (common sense);

(3) Then again, Company C comes along and creates a solution to offer an even BETTER quality of electricity than Company A, but again, CHEAPER than the electricity that is sold by Company B. In this case, the PEOPLE (represented as CONSUMERS) are KING b/c they are getting a better quality for a cheaper price;

(4) Now, again, will Company A and Company B just stand by and let Company C acquire a *de facto* EFFICIENCY monopoly??? OF COURST NOT!!! They are going to, in turn, drastically ***improve*** the QUALITY of their electricity while ***lowering*** the PRICE

.......and the cycle continues ON and ON AGAIN further enhancing the benefit to the PEOPLE!!!

Thank you for your full support.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 362

no
   

Total Seats: 255

abstain
 

Total Seats: 49


Random fact: Make sure your nation casts its nominations in Particracy's very own Security Council elections! For more information, see http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=8453

Random quote: "The trouble with practical jokes is that very often they get elected." - Will Rogers

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 55