We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: International Security & Humanity Protection Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Democratic Workers' Party and CTUL List
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2493
Description[?]:
| This bill proposes to revert all detrimental legislation as recently imposed by the CWFP, as well as de-privatising border control. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy towards giving aid to foreign countries.
Old value:: The government supplies "tied" aid to poorer nations in return for trading rights.
Current: The government gives moderate aid to countries in need.
Proposed: The government gives high levels of aid to countries in need.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The national refugee policy.
Old value:: Only refugees that are victims of extreme circumstances are welcome; they are given integration-aid.
Current: All refugees are welcome, regardless of their reason, and given aid in integrating them into the country.
Proposed: All refugees are welcome, regardless of their reason, and given aid in integrating them into the country.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Travel by foreigners to the nation.
Old value:: The nation imposes minimal border controls on visitors, with cursory security checks, to confirm visitor identities.
Current: The nation imposes minimal border controls on visitors, with cursory security checks, to confirm visitor identities.
Proposed: The nation imposes no border controls on visitors.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 14:06:14, November 29, 2007 CET | From | Kapitalist-Arbeitsfamilien Partei | To | Debating the International Security & Humanity Protection Act |
| Message | DWP, we can ONLY compromise on Article 2 on refugees. Everything else endangers National Security. FYI: The CWFP voted AGAINST the bill that privatized the border; that was proposed by AMI. Ironically, you are proposing that the border even be FURTHER privatised since border controls will go from "minimal" to "NONE!!!" |
| Date | 17:07:51, November 29, 2007 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the International Security & Humanity Protection Act |
| Message | How can removing an industry be privatising it, CWFP? |
| Date | 00:23:12, November 30, 2007 CET | From | Kapitalist-Arbeitsfamilien Partei | To | Debating the International Security & Humanity Protection Act |
| Message | TDP, what the heck are you talking about??? WHERE in the bill does it "remove" an industry??? In fact, the word does not even APPEAR!!!! This bill removes ALL border protection thus endangering NATIONAL SECURITY from the Lodamanse & Luthori TERRORISTS!!! [ :( ] |
| Date | 07:07:35, November 30, 2007 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the International Security & Humanity Protection Act |
| Message | The CWFP mentioned 'privatising' the order control. Border control is thus considered an industry. The DWP are talking about removing border control. Thus, they are talking about removing that 'industry'. Removing the border control, is not the same as privatising it. It's really not that hard. |
| Date | 10:37:22, November 30, 2007 CET | From | Permissive Social Union | To | Debating the International Security & Humanity Protection Act |
| Message | MMMMmm more toast. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 272 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 394 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar). |
| Random quote: "Since a politician never believes what he says, he is quite surprised to be taken at his word." Charles De Gaulle (1890 - 1970) |