We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Old Guard Manifest - Revised Version
Details
Submitted by[?]: Parti de Garde Royales
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2495
Description[?]:
| It goes without saying that the proposal regarding pornography does not make it legal for children to be in possession of child pornography. Only the stated is legal, not mentioning the rest does not make it legal for adults or minors. This was made by: Sen. James Summersdale Sen. Marie Toulouse Sen. Mingus Magnusson |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The use of animals in cosmetics research.
Old value:: The use of animals to test cosmetic products is regulated.
Current: Animals may not be used for testing cosmetics products.
Proposed: Animals may not be used for testing cosmetics products.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Curfew policy (curfew time to be determined in the bill description).
Old value:: Local governments may impose curfews, but only if a state of emergency has been declared.
Current: The national government may impose curfews, but only if a state of emergency has been declared.
Proposed: The national government may impose curfews, but only if a state of emergency has been declared.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The distribution, purchasing and possession of material depicting pornographic acts.
Old value:: Pornography depicting consenting adults is legal for everyone.
Current: Pornography depicting consenting adults is legal for adults.
Proposed: Pornography depicting consenting adults is legal for adults.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:34:08, December 01, 2007 CET | From | Liberal Conservative party | To | Debating the Old Guard Manifest - Revised Version |
| Message | sex isn't a dirty act and we shouldn't be screening our children from it... the third article is both an attack against free speech as well as our individual rights... it is basically censureship and we will not support this bill we could support both of the other proposals but not the third |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 49 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 134 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 17 |
| Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
| Random quote: "The proletarians of the world have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win. Workers of all countries: unite!" - Karl Marx |