We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Economical reform of 2494
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Fascist Revolutionary Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2496
Description[?]:
| This reform is necessary if we want to have a continuous strong economy |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Sales tax on essential goods such as food and non-luxury clothing.
Old value:: 0
Current: 10
Proposed: 10
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Employer's rights in regards to firing striking workers.
Old value:: Employers can fire workers who are deemed to have gone on strike without reasonable reasons.
Current: Government approval is needed before strikers can be fired.
Proposed: Employers are free to fire workers who go on strike.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:22:47, December 02, 2007 CET | From |  Wessex High Imperial Party | To | Debating the Economical reform of 2494 |
| Message | You would have us become a nation of slave-labor and automatons! We oppose this bill. |
| Date | 20:11:40, December 02, 2007 CET | From | The Hodirak'hi Workers Party | To | Debating the Economical reform of 2494 |
| Message | Article 2 is absurd |
| Date | 02:40:27, December 03, 2007 CET | From | One Nation Conservative Party | To | Debating the Economical reform of 2494 |
| Message | Hah, ridiculous but amusing. |
| Date | 06:30:56, December 04, 2007 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the Economical reform of 2494 |
| Message | A government should protect the least in a nation, not punish them as this bill proposes. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 5 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 446 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 174 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "The only difference between the Democrats and the Republicans is that the Democrats allow the poor to be corrupt, too." - Oscar Levant |