We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Red Dawn Agenda (xxx) - Regulation of Video Games
Details
Submitted by[?]: Red Hammer Council
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2498
Description[?]:
| "Will somebody please think of the children!" |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding regulation of video games.
Old value:: The government does not maintain laws as to age limitation for purchasing video games, although it does require a content rating to be clearly displayed on the box.
Current: The government does not maintain laws as to age limitation for purchasing video games, although it does require a content rating to be clearly displayed on the box.
Proposed: The government maintains strict age limitation laws that require proof of age before sales of video games may be made.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:09:57, December 08, 2007 CET | From | Red Hammer Council | To | Debating the Red Dawn Agenda (xxx) - Regulation of Video Games |
| Message | We want strict age limitations in order to protect our children from violent explicit content in certain video games. |
| Date | 16:35:31, December 08, 2007 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Red Dawn Agenda (xxx) - Regulation of Video Games |
| Message | Leave it for debate fool! |
| Date | 17:08:22, December 08, 2007 CET | From | Red Hammer Council | To | Debating the Red Dawn Agenda (xxx) - Regulation of Video Games |
| Message | Watch your language, jerk! |
| Date | 20:02:52, December 08, 2007 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Red Dawn Agenda (xxx) - Regulation of Video Games |
| Message | I got on the FLF for the same damn thing. Leave things for debate. It is not that hard. |
| Date | 23:23:40, December 08, 2007 CET | From | Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Red Dawn Agenda (xxx) - Regulation of Video Games |
| Message | Three things: -Keep it civil please, there's no need to call eachother names, that's what kiddies do. -On a sidenote, we would prefer a little debate period before a bill is moved to a vote as well. -We'll oppose this proposal. There is no need for the state interference. We're in full support for the current rating system, but we believe the end-responability lies with the child's parents: if they don't want their kid to play this or that games they can determine what's allright and what isn't.. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 240 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 155 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 104 |
| Random fact: There is a phpBB forum dedicated to Particracy. Please click the Forum link in the top game menu. Additions to the game, suggestions and discussion is held there so get involved. http://forum.particracy.net/ |
| Random quote: "They should rule who are able to rule best." - Aristotle |