We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Nuclear Weapons Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Democratic Labour Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2499
Description[?]:
Say no to devestation! |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of nuclear weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in warfare for any reason.
Current: The nation reserves the right to nuclear weapons in retaliation to a nuclear, chemical or biological attack.
Proposed: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The policy with respect to nuclear weaponry.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to develop, produce and store nuclear arms.
Current: The nation reserves the right to develop, produce and store nuclear arms.
Proposed: The nation shall never produce or store nuclear weaponry for military purposes. Research and development of the technology is permitted.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 06:48:27, December 10, 2007 CET | From | Evergreen Party | To | Debating the Nuclear Weapons Act |
Message | Pray tell, how would be defend ourselves should we come under attack? |
Date | 11:25:12, December 10, 2007 CET | From | Democratic Labour Party | To | Debating the Nuclear Weapons Act |
Message | Convensional weapons |
Date | 11:31:42, December 10, 2007 CET | From | Democratic Labour Party | To | Debating the Nuclear Weapons Act |
Message | Besides, what good have nuclear weapons done in the past? The only thing weapons on such a scale does it destroying civilian lives and habitats, and causes enviromental and econimical damages as well. |
Date | 11:36:24, December 10, 2007 CET | From | NPPE | To | Debating the Nuclear Weapons Act |
Message | OOC: Little Boy and Fat Man saved a lot more lives then they destroyed... |
Date | 17:41:52, December 10, 2007 CET | From | Democratic Labour Party | To | Debating the Nuclear Weapons Act |
Message | OOC: Saved?! They were about to capitulate. Already in June it was talk about capitulation. Plus it was civilians. |
Date | 18:11:07, December 10, 2007 CET | From | NPPE | To | Debating the Nuclear Weapons Act |
Message | OOC: no they weren't, thats just stories to make the US actions look bad |
Date | 05:14:14, December 11, 2007 CET | From | Partido Lariano Nacional | To | Debating the Nuclear Weapons Act |
Message | OOC: And the fact that they were mostly civilians doesn't matter???? |
Date | 18:18:26, December 11, 2007 CET | From | NPPE | To | Debating the Nuclear Weapons Act |
Message | OOC: civilians would be killed, anyway |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 222 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 179 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: In general, role-play requires the consent of all players. |
Random quote: "The communist revolution is the most radical rupture with traditional property relations; no wonder that its development involves the most radical rupture with traditional ideas." - Karl Marx |