We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Historic Sites Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Pithy Party-Liberty League
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2499
Description[?]:
| Why should the state decide which sites get protection and which ones don't? |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change National, cultural and historic sites and monuments.
Old value:: The state actively protects scenery, localities, cultural, and historical sites; it maintains an agency to preserve them untouched if public interest so requires.
Current: The state actively protects scenery, localities, cultural, and historical sites; it maintains an agency to preserve them untouched if public interest so requires.
Proposed: The state encourages and funds private efforts towards the protection of cultural and historical heritage.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 12:03:47, December 10, 2007 CET | From |  Guds og Konges Kjemprene | To | Debating the Historic Sites Act |
| Message | Better than now, so we're in favour. |
| Date | 12:18:49, December 10, 2007 CET | From | CSA Communist Party of the DPRK | To | Debating the Historic Sites Act |
| Message | no! you cant trust the privite sector to do everything! |
| Date | 20:55:36, December 10, 2007 CET | From | Science and Environment Party | To | Debating the Historic Sites Act |
| Message | We are for this change! |
| Date | 02:45:16, December 11, 2007 CET | From | Pithy Party-Liberty League | To | Debating the Historic Sites Act |
| Message | We of course are not proposing to turn everything over to the private sector. However, we think the private sector can do many things (but not everything) better and more efficiently than the government. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 428 | ||||||
| no | Total Seats: 322 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: "OOC", "IC" and "IG" are commonly-used acronyms in Particracy. "OOC" refers to comments, discussions and actions which are out-of-character, meaning they are done player-to-player rather than party-to-party. "IC" refers to in-character interactions (ie. party-to-party). Similarly, "IG" means in-game, although this term may also simply refer to what happens in the actual game interface, as opposed to on the forum or elsewhere. "RP" just means "role-play". |
| Random quote: "In Germany they first came for the Communists and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew. Then they came for the trade unionists and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist. Then they came for the Catholics, and I didn't speak up because I was a Protestant. Then they came for me--and by that time no one was left to speak up." - Pastor Martin Niemoller |