We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: PSFVP Nuclear Deterent and Emergency Policing Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Pan-Sekowo Freedom Alliance
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2499
Description[?]:
| Currently, our nculear deterent is not strong enough to fend off an attack with WMD's, we need to let any aggresors know that if they attack us with WMD's at all, they will be severley punished. Also, as recent riots etc have shown, the need to give the government power to keep order in times of chaos is great, thus we should give the police the option of military backing in times of serious emergency, so as to better protect our citizens. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's policy on the separation of the police and the military.
Old value:: A civilian police force is in place and the military is not allowed to play any part in it.
Current: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Proposed: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of nuclear weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons if victory is not feasibile by other means.
Current: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare unless another nation uses them first.
Proposed: The nation reserves the right to nuclear weapons in retaliation to a nuclear, chemical or biological attack.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 11:07:10, December 10, 2007 CET | From |  Normand Pluralist Party | To | Debating the PSFVP Nuclear Deterent and Emergency Policing Bill |
| Message | We are not entirely certain that this is necessary, either. However, we shall vote in favour if the Democratic Socialists and the Communists vote against. |
| Date | 06:20:42, December 11, 2007 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the PSFVP Nuclear Deterent and Emergency Policing Bill |
| Message | OOC: I'm curious how the NPP is going to vote now, since the SCP voted for and I am voting against. |
| Date | 06:23:35, December 11, 2007 CET | From | Normand Pluralist Party | To | Debating the PSFVP Nuclear Deterent and Emergency Policing Bill |
| Message | We may abstain. We shall wait for the USMC and the Independence Coalition to place their votes. |
| Date | 23:13:10, December 11, 2007 CET | From | Revolutionary State Socialist Party | To | Debating the PSFVP Nuclear Deterent and Emergency Policing Bill |
| Message | We vote yes, as this is at the core of USMC belifies, a strong military deterance is the keystone of lasting peace. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 539 | ||||||
| no | Total Seats: 211 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: In order for a Cabinet bill to pass, more than half of the legislature must vote for it and all of the parties included in the proposed Cabinet must support it. If your nation has a Head of State who is also the Head of Government, then the party controlling this character must also vote for the bill, since the Head of Government is also a member of the Cabinet. If any of these requirements are not met, the bill will not pass. |
| Random quote: "The theory of Communism may be summed up in the single sentence: abolition of private property." - Karl Marx |