Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5475
Next month in: 01:35:48
Server time: 06:24:11, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): Drax | hexaus18 | luthorian3059 | R Drax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Declaration of Peace, Unification, and Reconstruction

Details

Submitted by[?]: Imperial Pluralism Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2499

Description[?]:

The recent elections have demonstrated that the Sekowan people desire freedom and democracy over tyranny and brutal, needless violence. The people are ready for an end to war, and for the healing process of unification and reconstruction. Upon, passing this bill, the Government of Sekowo will undertake the following policies of unification:

1. All partisan and non-governmental militias are hereby banned and dissolved.
2. Any resistance to the previous provision will result in the military action of the Federal Armies against such groups.
3. Federal aid will be given to regions damaged by the civil war.
4. All politicians who organized or promoted the Declaration of Intent are hereby censured. However, they may be pardoned of all wrong doing if they apologize and swear to oppose any further Declarations of Intent or actions that may provoke civil conflict.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date02:07:34, December 11, 2007 CET
FromRevolutionary State Socialist Party
ToDebating the Declaration of Peace, Unification, and Reconstruction
MessageDSP is largest party.... are your party memebers having troulbe reading. The USMC may have had a terrible loss, but the IC had a greater loss.

OOC: My milita is down 124,576. Thats about 55%

Date02:28:50, December 11, 2007 CET
From Imperial Pluralism Party
ToDebating the Declaration of Peace, Unification, and Reconstruction
MessageOh, my apologies, maybe you didn't realize that your liberal bloc is a minority and completely lost the elections. We can outvote you in the legislature every time. Therefore, we control the army, and the army will easily overpower you petty militias. You're powerless.

Date02:34:03, December 11, 2007 CET
FromRevolutionary State Socialist Party
ToDebating the Declaration of Peace, Unification, and Reconstruction
MessageLegislative power does not mean control of the army. Soldiers, contrary to popular belief, think for themselves. And as such, upon the start of the civil war, they devided up into our camps.

Date02:41:36, December 11, 2007 CET
From Imperial Pluralism Party
ToDebating the Declaration of Peace, Unification, and Reconstruction
Messagethat's absurd from an RP standpoint. How small of a majority can claim to control federal troops? Why is your minority special? There's too much ambiguity. The legislature controls the nation in every respect, even the cabinet is under its control. And we control the legislature.

Date02:44:02, December 11, 2007 CET
FromRevolutionary State Socialist Party
ToDebating the Declaration of Peace, Unification, and Reconstruction
MessageWe are not a small minority, we are only a minority by 80 votes or so. And we do not claim to control federal troops, we state "there are no federal troops" When a civil war happens, they break up.

Date02:56:46, December 11, 2007 CET
From Imperial Pluralism Party
ToDebating the Declaration of Peace, Unification, and Reconstruction
MessageOOC:
What constitutes a small minority? And what if we disagree that there is a civil war?
My point is that all RP has to be based on in-game mechanisms. Those who control the game control the RP. In other words, since no one can make legitimate RP that contradicts the legislature, we have won this civil war and now control the federal armies, which are both intact and functioning.

Date02:59:21, December 11, 2007 CET
FromRevolutionary State Socialist Party
ToDebating the Declaration of Peace, Unification, and Reconstruction
MessageOOC: Very few in this game agree with you then. I'm sure 80% of people agree out of game mechanism RP can and SHOULD occur.

Date04:55:00, December 11, 2007 CET
FromPan-Sekowo Freedom Alliance
ToDebating the Declaration of Peace, Unification, and Reconstruction
MessageWe will vote yes on this, in hopes of dending the war, although we realise it will not work.

We do however, offer peace to the USMC, and remind them once again that they have no quarrel with us, and urge them not to attack us.

Date05:17:23, December 11, 2007 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Declaration of Peace, Unification, and Reconstruction
MessageJust because you don't want a civil war does'nt mean all the sudden you can just say it ended.

Date05:46:47, December 11, 2007 CET
From Imperial Pluralism Party
ToDebating the Declaration of Peace, Unification, and Reconstruction
Messageoh, but it does. What authority is higher than the will of the Folkstmma?

Date05:53:44, December 11, 2007 CET
FromSekowan Communist Party
ToDebating the Declaration of Peace, Unification, and Reconstruction
MessageSomeone doesn't seem to understand that in the event of a civil war, a legislature is kind of broken and useless.

Date05:54:27, December 11, 2007 CET
FromNormand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Declaration of Peace, Unification, and Reconstruction
MessageWe will vote for this if the Archonic Union of Politeia can promise us that provisions 1 and 2 are temporary measures to deal with the current crisis, and will be rescinded after the crisis is over.

Date05:59:01, December 11, 2007 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Declaration of Peace, Unification, and Reconstruction
MessageIf civil wars could be ended by a legislature deciding it, there would be very few civil wars.

It's not how it works in real life and therefore it's not how it works in the game either.

Date05:59:25, December 11, 2007 CET
From Imperial Pluralism Party
ToDebating the Declaration of Peace, Unification, and Reconstruction
MessageWe promise that provisions one and two are intended to stop the rebellious and violent actions of the leftist bloc and that these provisions, once they have served their purpose, will be rescinded.

Date06:03:44, December 11, 2007 CET
FromNormand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Declaration of Peace, Unification, and Reconstruction
MessageDemocratic Socialists: This will not necessarily bring an end to the civil war, but it will criminalize all of your militaristic actions. While the Folkstmma may not absolutely control all of the military (some units may decide to turn traitor and break chain of command), it is fully expected that the vast majority of the military will remain loyal to the Folkstmma and the people of Sekowo.

Date06:09:05, December 11, 2007 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Declaration of Peace, Unification, and Reconstruction
MessageOOC:

Dude, the military are usually the last ones to join the re-unifying process.

We controlled 55% of the military, 45% when you take into account the 10% who would automatically just quit.

Even if you take out another 10% that would change sides or whatever, we still control 35% of the military atleast, plus party militias, not to mention our own military equipment.

Just because the AUP is being a baby about things does'nt mean he gets his way.

Date06:16:36, December 11, 2007 CET
FromNormand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Declaration of Peace, Unification, and Reconstruction
MessageOOC:

Pay attention: The Normand Pluralist Party single-handedly dominates politics in Undarro. So-called "conservative" factions dominate the Lorrod and Hikhala Districts. The Bizena District is hotly contested. The only District in which your forces dominate is Hasowar. I expect that in Bizena, and certainly in Lorrod, Hikhala, and Undarro, the military will support the actions of the Folkstmma. That would leave you with, perhaps, of Sekowo's military.

Date06:18:16, December 11, 2007 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Declaration of Peace, Unification, and Reconstruction
MessageOOC:
Hasowar is also the most populace of the Federal Districts.
Plus all of our military supporters would have already been there, not spread throughout the nation.

Date06:25:14, December 11, 2007 CET
FromNormand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Declaration of Peace, Unification, and Reconstruction
MessageOOC:

This fact does not alter what we have stated.

Date00:36:40, December 12, 2007 CET
FromRevolutionary State Socialist Party
ToDebating the Declaration of Peace, Unification, and Reconstruction
MessageOOC: The military break up would have happened durring last elective period. A new term does not mean the military is magicly re-generated. The new term I'm guessing would effect causalties (IC, how are you comming on that RP about my losses?) and the power to recruit more.

Date01:00:08, December 12, 2007 CET
FromNormand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Declaration of Peace, Unification, and Reconstruction
MessageOOC: The military is controlled by the Folkstmma. I'm not talking about paramilitary forces/militias, but the regular navy and air force. These are controlled by civilian governments, and the Folkstmma is still the Folkstmma regardless of what percentage of what parties it is composed of. The military is certainly not created, but it remains loyal to the GOVERNMENT (not various political parties), as it always has.

Date01:08:38, December 12, 2007 CET
FromKébé Front
ToDebating the Declaration of Peace, Unification, and Reconstruction
MessageOOC: Not to interfere in your country, or anything but... Are you people really that insistent on taking the fun out of this? This is a game people. <_<

Date01:40:39, December 12, 2007 CET
FromSekowan Communist Party
ToDebating the Declaration of Peace, Unification, and Reconstruction
MessageNPP, it's been taken for granted in previous civil wars that the military splits along political lines. Fucking deal with it.

Date02:10:06, December 12, 2007 CET
FromRevolutionary State Socialist Party
ToDebating the Declaration of Peace, Unification, and Reconstruction
MessageOOC: Yes, we arn't making this up, their has been precident set by previous ones.

Date04:03:24, December 12, 2007 CET
From Imperial Pluralism Party
ToDebating the Declaration of Peace, Unification, and Reconstruction
MessageOOC: a civil war is an RP event. RP requires the cooperation and consent of both sides and especially of the legislature. It turns out that the majority of the legislature would like this RP war to end, and for it to end with a conservative victory. It\'s that simple. If we were willing to let this go on and participate in the RP war, then we would have made that clear. This is the only fair and reasonable way for RP to work. Otherwise, a minority of parties could force RP upon the majority, and that makes no sense. That is, we are not being bad sports within an RP war--we are effectively removing ourselves and this nation from it altogether.

Date04:42:15, December 12, 2007 CET
FromRevolutionary State Socialist Party
ToDebating the Declaration of Peace, Unification, and Reconstruction
MessageOOC: Everyone else is willing to RP. By voting yes here they are merely stating it would be favorable for the war to end now, as they would be on the winning side.

A basketball game does not end when one side says "we are winning, we quit now".

Date05:43:30, December 12, 2007 CET
From Imperial Pluralism Party
ToDebating the Declaration of Peace, Unification, and Reconstruction
MessageThis is not a basketball game or anything like it. If the Legislature itself or the consensus of the parties cannot determine when the war ends, then who can? We would have an endless war with no rules. We are the majority, and, like it or not, we determine how the RP proceeds, because if we can't, then nobody can. When this bill is passed, the civil war ends.

Date06:25:12, December 12, 2007 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Declaration of Peace, Unification, and Reconstruction
MessageThat's not how it works.

Just because you don't like it does'nt mean it ends.

Civil War RP simply is deon as RP, and as such it does'nt matter waht the legislature says, unless all parties agree.

Dude, seriously, we know alot more about it.

Date07:16:27, December 12, 2007 CET
FromNormand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Declaration of Peace, Unification, and Reconstruction
MessageThe RP war may continue, but we controll the Folkstmma, and, consequently, the vast majority of the military.

It would make sense to concede that the military of Hoswar remains loyal to your faction, the military of Bizena to the Folkstmma, the military of Undarro to the Normand Pluralist Party, and the military of the other two Districts to the Sekowo People's Alliance.

That's the reality of the people's support. To quote the Communists: "Fucking deal with it."

Date07:17:03, December 12, 2007 CET
FromNormand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Declaration of Peace, Unification, and Reconstruction
Message*Hasowar

Date07:26:09, December 12, 2007 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Declaration of Peace, Unification, and Reconstruction
MessageBizena is partially controlled by the APP and the UDL, so its more realistic to say Bizena's military would be split.

Anyways you have to take into consideration that the military was basically totally disbanded and either joined one of the two groups or became neutral, it would'nt change that much.

Date07:44:08, December 12, 2007 CET
FromNormand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Declaration of Peace, Unification, and Reconstruction
MessageWhen was the military disbanded? Only the Folstmma has that power.

Date07:53:04, December 12, 2007 CET
FromNormand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Declaration of Peace, Unification, and Reconstruction
MessageWhen was the military disbanded? Only the Folstmma has that power.

Date22:53:35, December 12, 2007 CET
FromRevolutionary State Socialist Party
ToDebating the Declaration of Peace, Unification, and Reconstruction
MessageOOC: It might nt be made clear, but it was suppost to happen at the start. IE as soon as the soliders heard about it. We probably had a failure to communicate in there somewhere as we were in a rush as I hadt o leave quickly as I'm in a different timezone. This also means the military would split BASED ON LAST ELECTION PERIOD. This election peroid has to do with caualties sence then. Hence, at teh start, Bisena was loyal to me, yet when I lost it, I allowed 100,000 soldiers. (not saying we don't still have stuff their, thats my main base x.x.)

Date04:39:45, December 13, 2007 CET
FromNormand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Declaration of Peace, Unification, and Reconstruction
MessageBut you didn't split until after the new election, did you? The military is loyal to the Folkstmma, not the various parties, and if the split was not declared until after the election

Anyway, the only thing which would make sense would be to have the military split along regional grounds, as I explained to the DSP via PM.

Date00:09:17, December 14, 2007 CET
FromRevolutionary State Socialist Party
ToDebating the Declaration of Peace, Unification, and Reconstruction
MessageWe split before the election.... You may not have seen it till after the election though. Well, regional is the same thing as what we do, we just don't mention regions. The regions we use are in the SSN topic on the forums.

Date03:03:52, December 14, 2007 CET
FromNormand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Declaration of Peace, Unification, and Reconstruction
MessageWell, if you split before the election, what would likely happen is the military would be divided among regional lines pre-election, but with massive defections in areas where control has changed drastically post-elections (particularly defections towards the faction which controls the Folkstmma).

Date03:04:47, December 14, 2007 CET
FromRevolutionary State Socialist Party
ToDebating the Declaration of Peace, Unification, and Reconstruction
MessageWitch is what we were doing until you started bickering with us.

Date03:10:50, December 14, 2007 CET
FromNormand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Declaration of Peace, Unification, and Reconstruction
MessageWe failed to realize that you had declared before the election.

Date03:22:55, December 14, 2007 CET
FromRevolutionary State Socialist Party
ToDebating the Declaration of Peace, Unification, and Reconstruction
MessageWell, as long as its all sorted now.

Date03:54:36, December 14, 2007 CET
FromNormand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Declaration of Peace, Unification, and Reconstruction
MessageWell, not exactly; it's now more complicated. =

Date04:52:11, December 14, 2007 CET
FromRevolutionary State Socialist Party
ToDebating the Declaration of Peace, Unification, and Reconstruction
Message*sigh*

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 438

no
   

Total Seats: 312

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: If there are no parties in your nation with seats, feel free to visit the forum and request an early election on the Early Election Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4362

    Random quote: "A conservative is a man with two perfectly good legs who, however, has never learned to walk forward." - Franklin D. Roosevelt

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 108