We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of February 2500
Details
Submitted by[?]: Partido Lariano Nacional
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2501
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
As per the Constitution, the Presidente de la República de Egelion chairs the cabinet.
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Indecisive Socialists United Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Democratic Labour Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Evergreen Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the 
Partido Lariano Nacional
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the bran1322 Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Partido Lariano Nacional
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the bran1322 Party
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the bran1322 Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Democratic Labour Party
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Communist Party of Egelion (KKE)
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Communist Party of Egelion (KKE)
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Indecisive Socialists United Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:37:28, December 13, 2007 CET | From | NPPE | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2500 |
| Message | I've been doing some calculating and if all my calculations were correct the situation looks like this: Technocrat Bloc 48715 P.A.S.O.K. 28394 Indecisive Socialists United Party 60267 Evergreen Party 30532 Democratic Labor Party 9651 lol bran1322 Party 36646 Alianza de Partidos y Fuerzas Populares 82318 ============================================ 296523 National-Populist Party of Egelion 575684 |
| Date | 03:45:02, December 13, 2007 CET | From | Partido Lariano Nacional | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2500 |
| Message | ¿uh?, I made the calcs like this: APFP = 99 seats Brian = 45 seats ISUP = 38 seats DLP = 28 seats Pasok = 19 seats EP = 10 seats Total of Alliance: 239 of 401 (59,6%). That means the majority of senate seats. Now in percentage (100% = 239) APFP = 41,4% Brian = 18,8% ISUP = 15,9% DLP = 11,7% PASOK = 7,9% EP = 4,3% Tot = 100% The cabinet divides between 13 ministers. According to the percentages I gave, there should be like this: APFP= 5,4 Brian = 2,4 ISUP = 2,1 DLP = 1,5 Pasok = 1,0 EP = 0,6 To look in plain numbers: APFP = 5 Brian = 2 ISUP = 2 DLP = 2 Pasok = 1 EP = 1 I'm giving up 2 ministeries, 1 to brian and 1 to pasok, so the final propose it's like this: APFP = 3 Brian = 3 ISUP = 2 DLP = 2 Pasok = 2 EP = 1 |
| Date | 11:22:03, December 13, 2007 CET | From | NPPE | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2500 |
| Message | I was calculating respective party militias |
| Date | 12:59:26, December 13, 2007 CET | From | Democratic Labour Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2500 |
| Message | Militas? You aren't considering anything, do you? |
| Date | 14:02:38, December 13, 2007 CET | From | NPPE | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2500 |
| Message | As a matter of fact, we have been considering certain things lately |
| Date | 16:24:17, December 13, 2007 CET | From | Evergreen Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2500 |
| Message | ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh |
| Date | 17:10:11, December 13, 2007 CET | From | Partido Lariano Nacional | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2500 |
| Message | anyway, are you sure?... my party says: You're using Rildanor accord, no?... let's see my party: APFP Fanatical Militarists: 7,3% (poll) APFP Votes in the last elections: 24,433,490 APFP Fanatical voters: 1,783,644 Divided by 12,5... Total: 142,691... you said: 82,318... what calculation did you do? |
| Date | 17:15:46, December 13, 2007 CET | From | Partido Lariano Nacional | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2500 |
| Message | NPPE: Militarist: 20% Elections: 32,423,188 M*E / 12,5 = 518,771 I'm kinda in a hurry so you do the rest. =P |
| Date | 17:19:21, December 13, 2007 CET | From | NPPE | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2500 |
| Message | the same calculations, but my pools gave you 3.6% and 3.8% fanatical militarists... well, it does say "margin of error +/- 3 %" for myself i've got 43,090,136 voters and 16.7% fanatical militarist |
| Date | 17:20:33, December 13, 2007 CET | From | Partido Lariano Nacional | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2500 |
| Message | 43,090,136????????? The votes are for the voters of the LAST election. And you got 32,423,188 and none else. |
| Date | 20:20:23, December 13, 2007 CET | From | NPPE | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2500 |
| Message | Its what the poll said |
| Date | 20:25:33, December 13, 2007 CET | From | NPPE | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2500 |
| Message | Actually, this does not check if the voter did vote or not, but just witch party they preferred. Ran another poll... giving me 39,065,417 voters with 21.6% fanatical militarist giving me 675050 |
| Date | 20:28:49, December 13, 2007 CET | From | Partido Lariano Nacional | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2500 |
| Message | One thing it's what the pool said... but if you see in the official results of the election (in your party or in the egelion report) your votes are 32,423,188. And I think that's the value the Rildanor Accord uses... as it says: * Party fanatical militarist faction% (poll) * Votes for party in last election / 12.5 Note the "Votes for party in last election". |
| Date | 20:32:45, December 13, 2007 CET | From | NPPE | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2500 |
| Message | in that case you get 74277 |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 239 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 127 | ||||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 35 |
| Random fact: When it comes to creating a Cultural Protocol in a Culturally Open nation, players are not necessarily required to provide a plausible backstory for how the nation's cultural background developed. However, the provision of a plausible backstory may be a factor in whether Moderation approves the Cultural Protocol if players in surrounding nations question its appropriateness for their region of the game map. |
| Random quote: "I say myself that I am beautiful, and I think that all woman strive to look like me.“ - Melissa Hargreaves, former Dranian politician |