We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: PSFVP Civil Defence BIll
Details
Submitted by[?]: Pan-Sekowo Freedom Alliance
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2500
Description[?]:
| Lets face it, the Civil War has shown that collatoral damage is a major problem in modern warfare. With the threat of WMDs from the USMC, as well as future wars, we feel more steps must be taken to protect the average man on the street from the ravages of warfare, and more civil defence will accomplish this well. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Civil defence is the government's policy on providing shelters to be used in the event of attacks on major cities, mainly nuclear attacks and bombing.
Old value:: The government builds and maintains a network of shelters across the nation.
Current: Local authorities are responsible for building and maintaining shelters.
Proposed: No new buildings may be constructed unless they feature provisions for civil defence.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 11:19:50, December 13, 2007 CET | From |  Pan-Sekowo Freedom Alliance | To | Debating the PSFVP Civil Defence BIll |
| Message | Lets face it, the Civil War has shown that collatoral damage is a major problem in modern warfare. With the threat of WMDs from the USMC, as well as future wars, we feel more steps must be taken to protect the average man on the street from the ravages of warfare, and more civil defence will accomplish this well. |
| Date | 14:33:55, December 13, 2007 CET | From | Normand Pluralist Party | To | Debating the PSFVP Civil Defence BIll |
| Message | We do not need more restrictive housing codes; the Normand Pluralist Party already takes the necessary measures to help prevent unnecessary problems. The USMC would never dare usual WMD's on Sekowan soil. |
| Date | 23:00:07, December 13, 2007 CET | From | Revolutionary State Socialist Party | To | Debating the PSFVP Civil Defence BIll |
| Message | I'm not going to nuke our cities x.x For all you know I just put them under my base to keep those that would from having them. Moderates do not do radical actions. However, we do wish to have the best civil defence available for all citizens, but all builidings may be a bit overkill. We shall wait for more comments. |
| Date | 00:36:28, December 14, 2007 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the PSFVP Civil Defence BIll |
| Message | We will support this. |
| Date | 01:49:00, December 14, 2007 CET | From | Revolutionary State Socialist Party | To | Debating the PSFVP Civil Defence BIll |
| Message | We shall support now, as our voters feel we are going soft of the defence issue. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 423 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 228 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 99 |
| Random fact: If you want to leave Particracy, please inactivate yourself on your user page to save the moderation team some time. |
| Random quote: "We can only protect liberty by making it relevant to the modern world." - Tony Blair |