Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5475
Next month in: 03:30:11
Server time: 04:29:48, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): hexaus18 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Conspicious Religion Bill (2500)

Details

Submitted by[?]: Normand Pluralist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2501

Description[?]:

We proposed that public servants not be denied freedom of expression related to religious preference any more than they are denied the freedom of expression relating to their sexual or political preferences.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:13:34, December 13, 2007 CET
FromIndependence Coalition
ToDebating the Conspicious Religion Bill (2500)
MessageReligious freedom must be maintain.

Date23:59:29, December 13, 2007 CET
FromRevolutionary State Socialist Party
ToDebating the Conspicious Religion Bill (2500)
MessageThis is one of the reasons why we fight. The government cannot take sides in relgion.

Date00:43:39, December 14, 2007 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Conspicious Religion Bill (2500)
MessageNo.

Government officials are part of the government and therefore must remain secular.

Date03:06:09, December 14, 2007 CET
FromNormand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Conspicious Religion Bill (2500)
MessageThe government does not take sides in religion.

It is hypocritical and repressive to require that public officials maintain silence on religion, and not in other controversial areas.

Ye hypocrits!

Date03:57:02, December 14, 2007 CET
FromRevolutionary State Socialist Party
ToDebating the Conspicious Religion Bill (2500)
MessageNo, the government should not take sides in issues that promote favoritism.

Date08:21:53, December 14, 2007 CET
FromNormand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Conspicious Religion Bill (2500)
Message"The government" will not be taking sides, USMC, though you clearly are.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 228

no
      

Total Seats: 522

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: In general, role-play requires the consent of all players.

    Random quote: "Power always has to be kept in check; power exercised in secret, especially under the cloak of national security, is doubly dangerous." - William Proxmire

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 62