Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5477
Next month in: 00:19:35
Server time: 23:40:24, May 01, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Klexi | PortCrab | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: High Court Nonimee Ratification

Details

Submitted by[?]: Wessex High Imperial Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2501

Description[?]:

Regarding our current vacancy on the High Court, I have heard back from our Atabeg:

"I hereby forward Claudia Stepan for the confirmation vote of the high court.

Atabeg Accipitrum Dame Andrea Belknap OPC MP,"

Please vote for or against this appointment.

Thank you,
Portia di Venicci, Chancellor of Justice

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date04:48:51, December 14, 2007 CET
FromWessex High Imperial Party
ToDebating the High Court Nonimee Ratification
MessageOOC: I forgot to mention, Claudia Stepan has been nominated by the ETPRP

Date05:15:40, December 14, 2007 CET
FromSocial Democratic Party
ToDebating the High Court Nonimee Ratification
MessageThe SDP will not hold political litmus tests when it comes to high court nominations. Our criteria consists simply of whether or not we believe a nominee to be qualified, and Ms. Stepan is that.

Date14:33:26, December 14, 2007 CET
FromNew Liberal Party
ToDebating the High Court Nonimee Ratification
MessageWe are not very pleased that the High Court Nominee Places are divided amongst the largest parlamentary parties. However, we believe that Ms. Stepan is qualified, so we support her!

Date17:36:06, December 14, 2007 CET
FromNational Fascist Revolutionary Party
ToDebating the High Court Nonimee Ratification
Message"We are not very pleased that the High Court Nominee Places are divided amongst the largest parlamentary parties. However, we believe that Ms. Stepan is qualified, so we support her!" we are the biggest party and we dont have any Hig Court Nominee Places, we find this very unfair

Date18:06:19, December 14, 2007 CET
FromThe Hodirak'hi Workers Party
ToDebating the High Court Nonimee Ratification
MessageIm not included in anything!

Date18:40:17, December 14, 2007 CET
FromWessex High Imperial Party
ToDebating the High Court Nonimee Ratification
MessageDear Parties:

There is a strict method of determining how a magistrate is placed on the High Court of Pontesi. Under separate cover, I will send you these rules and regulations so that you may see the process.

Portia di Venicci, Chancellor of Justice

Date00:27:55, December 15, 2007 CET
FromNew Liberal Party
ToDebating the High Court Nonimee Ratification
MessagePlease do!

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 424

no
  

Total Seats: 201

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Players who deliberately attempt to present a misleading picture of the nation's current RP laws will be subject to sanction.

Random quote: "Dissent is the highest form of patriotism." - Howard Zinn

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 63