We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: The Animal Cruelty Act of 2501
Details
Submitted by[?]: Christliche Demokratie
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2502
Description[?]:
Article 1 Click here to remove this proposal. Proposal[?] to change The use of animals in cosmetics research. Old value:: The use of animals to test cosmetic products is regulated. Current: The use of animals to test cosmetic products is regulated. Proposed: Animals may not be used for testing cosmetics products. Article 2 Click here to remove this proposal. Proposal[?] to change The use of animals in medical research. Old value:: The use of animals in research is subject to basic regulations. Current: The use of animals in research is subject to basic regulations. Proposed: Animal research projects must apply for a license and submit to regulation. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The use of animals in cosmetics research.
Old value:: The use of animals to test cosmetic products is regulated.
Current: Animals may not be used for testing cosmetics products.
Proposed: Animals may not be used for testing cosmetics products.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The use of animals in medical research.
Old value:: The use of animals in research is subject to basic regulations.
Current: The use of animals in research is subject to basic regulations.
Proposed: Animal research projects must apply for a license and submit to regulation.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 04:08:54, December 17, 2007 CET | From | Revolutionary Socialist Front | To | Debating the The Animal Cruelty Act of 2501 |
Message | Why the support for this bill? Animal rights activists are nutjobs who don't understand that animals don't have rights in the sense that we do. |
Date | 06:21:34, December 17, 2007 CET | From | Christliche Demokratie | To | Debating the The Animal Cruelty Act of 2501 |
Message | Well according to the way the nation voted there are a lot more nutjobs than there are normal people. |
Date | 06:32:37, December 17, 2007 CET | From | Hulstrian Nationalist Party | To | Debating the The Animal Cruelty Act of 2501 |
Message | So you'd prefer cosmetic testing to be performed on people rather than animals? |
Date | 06:42:39, December 17, 2007 CET | From | Christliche Demokratie | To | Debating the The Animal Cruelty Act of 2501 |
Message | I'm sorry I don't and I don't think anyone else remembers me perfering anything relating with cosmetic testing done on humans. Oh it appears the human to nationalist translator called in sick? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 313 | |||||
no | Total Seats: 143 | |||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 44 |
Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar). |
Random quote: "All history has been a history of class struggles between dominated classes at various stages of social development." - Friedrich Engels |