We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Religious acceptance act.

Details

Submitted by^[?]: Conservative Christian Royalists

Status^[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2040

Description^[?]:

freedom of religion.

Proposal^[?] to change The government's policy with respect to prayer in schools.

Old value:: The government leaves this decision up to the schools themselves.

Current: Teacher-led prayers in schools are forbidden, except in religious schools.

Proposed: The government leaves this decision up to the schools themselves.

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date	not recorded
From	Conservative Christian Royalists
To	Debating the Religious acceptance act.
Message	I find it hard to believe that the political partys of this nation have proceeded to slander fascism when prayers are still not allowed in schools. different kind of fascism YES but more acceptable NO. please realise that if children never hear of religion the good sense and morals of religion (any religion) will be lost in our society forever. that will indeed be a sad day for kirlawa. i am not even pressing for prayers in every school to be a nescessity, rather that the schools be allowed to choose.

Date	not recorded
From	Kirlawa Green Party
To	Debating the Religious acceptance act.
Message	We support this proposal

Date	not recorded
From	Federalist Labour Party
To	Debating the Religious acceptance act.
Message	Indoctrination should never be acceptable in compulsory government schools. This bill unfortunately concerns all schools,there for we are forced to regretfully vote against.

Date	not recorded
From
To	Debating the Religious acceptance act.
Message	This may lead a sectarianisation of the education system . We'd also like to note that a school could become a fascist regime (GBL's sense of the word) if the school was allowed to decide what its students were taught. we feal if the student was able to abstain from a religious school it could lead to impracticalities. We would be in favour of individual teachers reserving the right to set up voluntary religious classes. Also if we were to have a class generally about religion it would be good.

Date	not recorded
From	Federalist Labour Party
To	Debating the Religious acceptance act.
Message	Hell with it, if the majority is bent on indoctrinating the youth with secular humanism, why not religion? I'll support this to add religion to the already oppressive compulsory curriculum.

Date	not recorded
From	Kirlawa Green Party
To	Debating the Religious acceptance act.
Message	Every form of learning is a form of 'indoctrination'. Whenever people learn something from other people they are being influcenced. Welcome to the real world

Date	not recorded
From	Federalist Labour Party
To	Debating the Religious acceptance act.
Message	You do not understand. There's a different between forced indoctrination and chosen. You care nothing for the minority. Welcome to the real world.

Date	not recorded
From	Federalist Labour Party
To	Debating the Religious acceptance act.
Message	difference*

Date	not recorded
From	Noordelijk Bevrijding Front
To	Debating the Religious acceptance act.
Message	Would you have children taught that white people are superior to others if at least the school kept to the cirriculem. Then if faith schools are allowed why should fascist/white supremicist/communist schools be able to operate? This is the same idea

Date	not recorded
From	Noordelijk Bevrijding Front
To	Debating the Religious acceptance act.
Message	Schools should teach the accepted truth. Until god comes down and says remember me faith in schools is lying to children. Keep faith out of schools, what about the atheists in the school?

Date	not recorded
From	Noordelijk Bevrijding Front
To	Debating the Religious acceptance act.
Message	Be taught about religion but not taught religion as if it is true

Date	not recorded
From	Federalist Labour Party
To	Debating the Religious acceptance act.
Message	I do not support compulsory education, thus I do not believe in state funded faith based, secular humanist nor "fascist/white supremicist/communist schools". Freedom is Freedom, secular humanism; as well as religious based ideologies all require faith to a curtain extent. Saying secular belief is not flawed and is scientificly perfect is utterly ignorant.

Date	not recorded
From	Conservative Christian Royalists
To	Debating the Religious acceptance act.
Message	well tell you what then. if i can see the egg and aperm connecting in someones body with my own eyes, only then will i believe it. what a stupied and ignorant comment green leaves.

Date	not recorded
From
To	Debating the Religious acceptance act.
Message	What?

Date	not recorded
From	Conservative Christian Royalists
To	Debating the Religious acceptance act.
Message	the green leaves were saying if i cant see it its not true.

Date	not recorded
From	Senatus et Populusque Kirlawan(SPQK)
To	Debating the Religious acceptance act.
Message	Sorry but no. We cannot vote for indroctination.

Date	not recorded
From	Noordelijk Bevrijding Front
To	Debating the Religious acceptance act.
Message	An egg sperm etc is actually proven to exist by that old chestnut science. i dont want to argue i was simply expressing a view just keep religion out of state and education affairs

Vote

Seats

yes

Total Seats: 118

Total Seats: 77

abstain

Total Seats: 0

Random fact: Particracy does not allow role-play that seems to belong to the world of fantasy, science fiction and futuristic speculation.

Random quote: "The more you observe politics, the more you've got to admit that each party is worse than the other." - Will Rogers

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 83