We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Freeminded People's Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2503
Description[?]:
(None) |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The constitutional right and responsibility to propose a cabinet to the legislature.
Old value:: Only the largest party can propose a cabinet.
Current: Each party can propose a cabinet coalition.
Proposed: Each party can propose a cabinet coalition.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 15:50:28, December 19, 2007 CET | From | Dranian Free Anarchist Faction | To | Debating the Cabinet Act |
Message | Boom! We have a 2/3 vote! |
Date | 16:03:06, December 19, 2007 CET | From | Pro Grain Club | To | Debating the Cabinet Act |
Message | Wow! How many attempts did this take! Congrats on the persistence! |
Date | 16:56:38, December 19, 2007 CET | From | Order of Valtiel | To | Debating the Cabinet Act |
Message | OOC: You know that this will get switched right back the next time we get the majority, right? |
Date | 20:59:53, December 19, 2007 CET | From | Freeminded People's Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Act |
Message | A two-thirds majority is required to change this -- it will probably be a while before it gets changed back. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 503 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 213 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 34 |
Random fact: Players consent to the reasonable and predictable consequences of the role-play they consent to. For example, players who role-play their characters as committing criminal offences should expect those characters to experience the predictable judicial consequences of that. |
Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia) |