We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of May 2104
Details
Submitted by[?]: Friendly Communist's of Likatonia
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2106
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Friendly Communist's of Likatonia
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Right Wing Liberals Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Right Wing Liberals Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the AM Radical Libertarian Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Friendly Communist's of Likatonia
Article 6
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Friendly Communist's of Likatonia
Article 7
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Right Wing Liberals Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the AM Radical Libertarian Party
Article 9
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Friendly Communist's of Likatonia
Article 10
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the AM Radical Libertarian Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 14:21:33, September 01, 2005 CET | From | Friendly Communist's of Likatonia | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2104 |
| Message | i think a new cabinate is in order as i dont think that we have had a change in the last 2 elections. this comprises of the 3 largest parties having almost equal number of positions. |
| Date | 15:30:09, September 01, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Party for Equality | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2104 |
| Message | We are in favour of such a cabinet. |
| Date | 05:08:49, September 02, 2005 CET | From | Söhne der Freiheit | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2104 |
| Message | The coalition government has kept its very large lead in the election, and as such the dissolution of the cabinet is unnecessary. |
| Date | 23:20:59, September 02, 2005 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2104 |
| Message | Response to FCoL: The Anarch Anakrousite party, along with our other, less-well favoured, compatriots, are feeling less than represented in this current suggested cabinet. While that IS the option of the majority parties, and while that is your option to suggest, the token attribution of one or two cabinet positions to lesser demographics may be enough to curry favour of the less fortunate, and offset some of the potential 'nay' vote, should the CCU chose to vote against this measure. The final decision, of course, rests with yoursleves, and the voters. We await your commentary. |
| Date | 17:13:05, September 03, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Liberal Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2104 |
| Message | After our shockingly poor performance, the CPL is more than willing to support the current coalition, rather than the new cabinet. |
| Date | 01:08:32, September 04, 2005 CET | From | Friendly Communist's of Likatonia | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2104 |
| Message | with all due respect the old cabinet is over 8 year old and that is more than enough time to show that a new cabinet is in order. i am in favour of the ideal that 'if it isnt broken dont fix it' but if it is over 8 years old then it needs replacing, not just because the larger parties want to but, because the majority of people supporting these parts want a new cabinet. support this bill if u want a brighter future. if you oppose, you oppose the progress of the country and that isnt in the intrest of its people. |
| Date | 01:19:24, September 04, 2005 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2104 |
| Message | The AAP endorses the FCL's current lineup for Cabinet positions, despite the poor representation of AAP members in the cabinet. Pehaps, with time, and added recognition, the AAP can be in a position to more ably serve our brave Likatonian government. The AAP would also like to suggest to our other brethren and sistren: The CURRENT lineup is not working - perhaps we SHOULD change horses in the middle of this stream, since THIS horse seems to be drowning. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 107 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 31 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 77 |
| Random fact: Particracy is completely free! If you want to support the game financially, feel free to make a small donation to the lievenswouter@gmail.com Paypal account. |
| Random quote: "Were it not for electricity, we would have to watch television in the dark." - Muammar Gaddafi- |