Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 01:31:26
Server time: 18:28:33, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Mindus | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Narcotics Act II

Details

Submitted by[?]: Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2105

Description[?]:

A bill to decriminalise what is none of the government's business.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date14:22:51, September 01, 2005 CET
From Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX
ToDebating the Narcotics Act II
MessageWhy? Well, let's check the Constitution, shall we:

Bill of Rights:
xxiii. Everyone has the right to self determination in body.
xxv. Everyone has the right to self determination in existence.
xxvi. Everyone has the right to self determination in lifestyle.

Need we say more?

Date20:36:50, September 01, 2005 CET
FromHosengott Nationalists
ToDebating the Narcotics Act II
MessageYes we have no problem with letting the druggies legally kill themselves it just saves us the trouble.

Date01:51:13, September 02, 2005 CET
From Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX
ToDebating the Narcotics Act II
MessageAs opposed to illegally killing themselves? =P

This should pass if the New Dems are on board...?

Date02:29:28, September 02, 2005 CET
Fromtrucido ignarae Party
ToDebating the Narcotics Act II
MessageAnd if they don't all OD? we would increase addiction in the population. i'm all for eliminating the druggies, but it's a risky method

Date05:48:10, September 02, 2005 CET
From Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX
ToDebating the Narcotics Act II
Message"we would increase addiction in the population."

And that's your businesss how?

Date06:38:34, September 02, 2005 CET
FromHosengott Nationalists
ToDebating the Narcotics Act II
MessageBecause we are the government and we are supposed to care for our citizens.
Hence ya know medical care etc we dont just say pay taxes every year and leave them be now do we.
This may be risky but think of it itll eliminate the weakest and then those who are weak enough to fall to addiction can be singled out from the rest eventually.

Date08:20:03, September 02, 2005 CET
FromDemocratic Socialists
ToDebating the Narcotics Act II
MessageWe're in support of this.

Date08:47:36, September 02, 2005 CET
From Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX
ToDebating the Narcotics Act II
MessageGood to hear.

Date01:37:25, September 03, 2005 CET
Fromtrucido ignarae Party
ToDebating the Narcotics Act II
Messageya i like that

Date09:02:28, September 03, 2005 CET
FromCentrist Party
ToDebating the Narcotics Act II
MessageOOC: The constitution's ******.

IC: *sighs* We support *mumbles incoherently* Stupid constitution.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
       

Total Seats: 419

no
 

Total Seats: 22

abstain
  

Total Seats: 13


Random fact: Before creating a party organisation, check to see whether there are any existing organisations which cover the same agenda.

Random quote: "All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood." - Universal Declaration of Human Rights

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 71