We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Narcotics Act II
Details
Submitted by[?]: Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2105
Description[?]:
| A bill to decriminalise what is none of the government's business. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The recreational drug policy.
Old value:: The use of cannabis is legal.
Current: There are no laws regulating what citizens can put into their bodies.
Proposed: There are no laws regulating what citizens can put into their bodies.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 14:22:51, September 01, 2005 CET | From |  Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX | To | Debating the Narcotics Act II |
| Message | Why? Well, let's check the Constitution, shall we: Bill of Rights: xxiii. Everyone has the right to self determination in body. xxv. Everyone has the right to self determination in existence. xxvi. Everyone has the right to self determination in lifestyle. Need we say more? |
| Date | 20:36:50, September 01, 2005 CET | From | Hosengott Nationalists | To | Debating the Narcotics Act II |
| Message | Yes we have no problem with letting the druggies legally kill themselves it just saves us the trouble. |
| Date | 01:51:13, September 02, 2005 CET | From | Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX | To | Debating the Narcotics Act II |
| Message | As opposed to illegally killing themselves? =P This should pass if the New Dems are on board...? |
| Date | 02:29:28, September 02, 2005 CET | From | trucido ignarae Party | To | Debating the Narcotics Act II |
| Message | And if they don't all OD? we would increase addiction in the population. i'm all for eliminating the druggies, but it's a risky method |
| Date | 05:48:10, September 02, 2005 CET | From | Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX | To | Debating the Narcotics Act II |
| Message | "we would increase addiction in the population." And that's your businesss how? |
| Date | 06:38:34, September 02, 2005 CET | From | Hosengott Nationalists | To | Debating the Narcotics Act II |
| Message | Because we are the government and we are supposed to care for our citizens. Hence ya know medical care etc we dont just say pay taxes every year and leave them be now do we. This may be risky but think of it itll eliminate the weakest and then those who are weak enough to fall to addiction can be singled out from the rest eventually. |
| Date | 08:20:03, September 02, 2005 CET | From | Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Narcotics Act II |
| Message | We're in support of this. |
| Date | 08:47:36, September 02, 2005 CET | From | Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX | To | Debating the Narcotics Act II |
| Message | Good to hear. |
| Date | 01:37:25, September 03, 2005 CET | From | trucido ignarae Party | To | Debating the Narcotics Act II |
| Message | ya i like that |
| Date | 09:02:28, September 03, 2005 CET | From | Centrist Party | To | Debating the Narcotics Act II |
| Message | OOC: The constitution's ******. IC: *sighs* We support *mumbles incoherently* Stupid constitution. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 419 | |||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 22 | |||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 13 |
| Random fact: Zardugal is a nation based on the old Byzantine Empire, with a modern twist and the Esperanto language. Zardugal is located on the continent of Majatra. |
| Random quote: “Human rights means doing whatever the fuck you want” - Benji Benandez, former Dranian politician |