We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Citizenship (Illegal Immigrants) Amendment Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Judicial Union Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2508
Description[?]:
| An act to amend the regulations for illegal immigrants. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change
The government's stance on illegal aliens.
Old value:: The government actively searches houses for illegal aliens and expels them from the country.
Current: The government does not actively search for illegal aliens, but expels them from the country when discovered.
Proposed: The government does not actively search for illegal aliens, but puts them in integration centers when discovered.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 03:23:06, December 28, 2007 CET | From | Judicial Union Party | To | Debating the Citizenship (Illegal Immigrants) Amendment Act |
| Message | We should be welcoming to all people who wish to live in our country. |
| Date | 03:49:53, December 28, 2007 CET | From | JDW Tukarali Greens Party | To | Debating the Citizenship (Illegal Immigrants) Amendment Act |
| Message | support. this is beyond belief. my party has now supported the JUP three times in a row. if our society is going to continue to reap the benefits of having cheap labor from illegal immigrants it needs to recognize that it best to help them integrate than send them back home only to sneak back in again. |
| Date | 04:39:00, December 28, 2007 CET | From | Tukarali Graenix Party | To | Debating the Citizenship (Illegal Immigrants) Amendment Act |
| Message | Agree |
| Date | 14:38:37, December 28, 2007 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Citizenship (Illegal Immigrants) Amendment Act |
| Message | Hell no. They should not be integrated. Why integrate lawbreakers? That'll just encourage more lawbreaking by people from other nations who want in. We have a proscribed route for immigration. Let them follow that. |
| Date | 11:47:32, December 29, 2007 CET | From | Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Citizenship (Illegal Immigrants) Amendment Act |
| Message | Well support |
| Date | 17:46:52, December 29, 2007 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Citizenship (Illegal Immigrants) Amendment Act |
| Message | Fools all of you. Supportin lawbreakers. |
| Date | 21:54:44, December 29, 2007 CET | From | Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Citizenship (Illegal Immigrants) Amendment Act |
| Message | What's with this "fool"-yelling? You're not Mr. T, are you? :D |
| Date | 21:54:59, December 29, 2007 CET | From | Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Citizenship (Illegal Immigrants) Amendment Act |
| Message | PS: If you are, I'ld like an autograph ;) |
| Date | 02:26:47, December 30, 2007 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Citizenship (Illegal Immigrants) Amendment Act |
| Message | Mr. T would have voted against this bill. Shame on you for supporting lawbreakers. |
| Date | 03:30:25, December 30, 2007 CET | From | Judicial Union Party | To | Debating the Citizenship (Illegal Immigrants) Amendment Act |
| Message | It's just like someone stealing bread to feed their family. We mustn't show any kind of mercy for these lawbreakers. |
| Date | 18:16:46, December 30, 2007 CET | From | Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Citizenship (Illegal Immigrants) Amendment Act |
| Message | I love it when a plan comes together.. Moeha! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 267 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 232 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Particracy allows you to establish an unelected head of state like a monarch or a president-for-life, but doing this is a bit of a process. First elect a candidate with the name "." to the Head of State position. Then change your law on the "Structure of the executive branch" to "The head of state is hereditary and symbolic; the head of government chairs the cabinet" and change the "formal title of the head of state" to how you want the new head of state's title and name to appear (eg. King Percy XVI). |
| Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia) |