We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Budget proposal of August 2507
Details
Submitted by[?]: Judicial Union Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2509
Description[?]:
| The Judicial Union Party propose to adjust the government's spending budget to better address the economic and social situation of the United Tribes of Tukarali. 1. Ministry of Justice Funding increased, to provide for more police and a more efficient justice system. 2. Ministry of Health and Social Services Funding increased, so that we are able to provide a better health service to all our citizens, including reducing waiting times, hiring more specialists, and subsidising a wider range of drugs. 3. Ministry of Education and Culture Funding increased, in order to fund the pre-school programme recently required by law, and to provide for more schools and teachers in primary and secondary schools. 4. Ministry of Science and Technology Funding increased, to provide more money for research. 5. Ministry of Environment and Tourism Funding increased, to better look after the environment of Tukarali, and encourage more tourists to visit. |
Proposals
Article 1
| Ministry | Current Budget | Old Budget | Propesed Budget |
| Head of Government | 2,000,000,000 TUK | 1,000,000,000 TUK | 1,000,000,000 TUK |
| Foreign Affairs | 50,000,000,000 TUK | 100,000,000,000 TUK | 100,000,000,000 TUK |
| Internal Affairs | 150,000,000,000 TUK | 100,000,000,000 TUK | 100,000,000,000 TUK |
| Finance | 30,000,000,000 TUK | 150,000,000,000 TUK | 150,000,000,000 TUK |
| Defence | 300,000,000,000 TUK | 200,000,000,000 TUK | 200,000,000,000 TUK |
| Justice | 200,000,000,000 TUK | 200,000,000,000 TUK | 250,000,000,000 TUK |
| Infrastructure and Transport | 250,000,000,000 TUK | 500,000,000,000 TUK | 500,000,000,000 TUK |
| Health and Social Services | 700,000,000,000 TUK | 400,000,000,000 TUK | 800,000,000,000 TUK |
| Education and Culture | 400,000,000,000 TUK | 600,000,000,000 TUK | 700,000,000,000 TUK |
| Science and Technology | 325,000,000,000 TUK | 350,000,000,000 TUK | 400,000,000,000 TUK |
| Food and Agriculture | 350,000,000,000 TUK | 150,000,000,000 TUK | 150,000,000,000 TUK |
| Environment and Tourism | 62,000,000,000 TUK | 50,000,000,000 TUK | 100,000,000,000 TUK |
| Trade and Industry | 300,000,000,000 TUK | 200,000,000,000 TUK | 200,000,000,000 TUK |
| Total | 3,119,000,000,000 TUK | 3,001,000,000,000 TUK | 3,651,000,000,000 TUK |
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 04:09:46, December 28, 2007 CET | From | Judicial Union Party | To | Debating the Budget proposal of August 2507 |
| Message | Should this pass, and the related taxation bill pass, we will prepare another budget to allocate remaining funds, in accordance with suggestions made by other parties. |
| Date | 14:35:17, December 28, 2007 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Budget proposal of August 2507 |
| Message | This bill will put us into a deficit. We'll oppose. |
| Date | 15:55:40, December 28, 2007 CET | From | Judicial Union Party | To | Debating the Budget proposal of August 2507 |
| Message | No it won't. This follows from the increase in tax income from the taxation bill. It would leave us with around a 200 billion TUK surplus. |
| Date | 18:17:24, December 28, 2007 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Budget proposal of August 2507 |
| Message | You really have no clue as to how economics work do you? |
| Date | 23:32:31, December 28, 2007 CET | From | Judicial Union Party | To | Debating the Budget proposal of August 2507 |
| Message | What would make you say that? We can promise that we know more than you do. |
| Date | 17:35:46, December 29, 2007 CET | From | JDW Tukarali Greens Party | To | Debating the Budget proposal of August 2507 |
| Message | what is the difference between the current budget and the old budget? how old is the old budget? |
| Date | 18:08:05, December 29, 2007 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Budget proposal of August 2507 |
| Message | http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=164737 |
| Date | 18:08:16, December 29, 2007 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Budget proposal of August 2507 |
| Message | It just passed. |
| Date | 01:32:58, December 30, 2007 CET | From | Tukarali Graenix Party | To | Debating the Budget proposal of August 2507 |
| Message | Wow, the monopoly the JUP and GLDS have hasn't worked this time. |
| Date | 13:45:21, December 30, 2007 CET | From | JDW Tukarali Greens Party | To | Debating the Budget proposal of August 2507 |
| Message | so this all the adders to the budget come out of thin air? there has been no economic justification of this bill |
| Date | 18:07:13, December 30, 2007 CET | From | Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Budget proposal of August 2507 |
| Message | We form a coalition government, but there is no monopoly between the JUP and the GLDS. We do have several common views, but this doesn't mean we vote alike all the time, there's lots of topics on which we diifer in opinion. This proposal we happen to oppose. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 221 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 278 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Bill descriptions must be in English, or at least include a full English translation. Bill titles may appear in a language that is appropriate to the nation and are not required to be translated into English. |
| Random quote: "The strongest reason for people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." - Thomas Jefferson |