We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: LDP:2507:14 - Condemnation of the CEO (Amended)
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberal Democrat Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2509
Description[?]:
| This bill proposes to bring a resolution to the floor condemning the CEO Ms Johnson for neglecting her duties by not forming a cabinet. The cabinet has been neglected by the CEO for too long. As it stands the cabinet does not have a representative for finance, Infrastructure and Transport, Education and Culture & Science and Technology. We have not had a person in these positions for over 10 years! The LDP are calling for a censure resolution publicly condemning the actions of the CEO. A regular majority is required to pass the motion. The wording of the condemnation is to be published as follows: "For failure to exercise her constitutional duties, the Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation of Vanuku, Ms Claire Johnson, is hereby publicly condemned by the Board of Directors for her failure to institute an appropriate cabinet as required by her under the Constutition of the Corporation of Vanuku." |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 10:13:31, December 28, 2007 CET | From | Vanuku Nationalists Party | To | Debating the LDP:2507:14 - Condemnation of the CEO (Amended) |
| Message | Total Support. This must end and Ms Johnson must act! |
| Date | 04:48:35, December 29, 2007 CET | From | Vanuku Corporate Alliance | To | Debating the LDP:2507:14 - Condemnation of the CEO (Amended) |
| Message | "and the Foreign Affairs spokesman will be required to broadcast the condemnation to all other nations if passed." We will not vote for the measure due to this clause. Vanuku's problems are its own. To advertise such things on the world stage invites views of weakness and strife. Which is terrible for business. |
| Date | 05:09:18, December 29, 2007 CET | From | Liberal Democrat Party | To | Debating the LDP:2507:14 - Condemnation of the CEO (Amended) |
| Message | Are you saying if the proposal to have the foreign affairs spokesman broadcast the condemnation around the world is removed you will be prepared to vote in favour of the movement? |
| Date | 13:00:31, December 30, 2007 CET | From | Vanuku Corporate Alliance | To | Debating the LDP:2507:14 - Condemnation of the CEO (Amended) |
| Message | The VCA will certainly vote "no" should that section of the proposal remain. We have not yet completely made up our minds, and would indeed like the VPA to comment on this measure to state their answer to the charge of malfeasance. However, the VCA is leaning towards supporting this measure as the cabinet situation is not yet resolved to our satisfaction. ((the VPA's absence is curiously timed with the Christmas season, we suspect that may have something to do with the silence)) |
| Date | 00:41:35, December 31, 2007 CET | From | Liberal Democrat Party | To | Debating the LDP:2507:14 - Condemnation of the CEO (Amended) |
| Message | we have amended the bill as requested and now look forward to the support of the VCA. Regardless whether the VPA are on Christmas holidays, they didnt have the courtesy to advise us of that fact like Party Party did and she also had many an opportunity to pass a cabinet long before that. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 91 | ||||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 14 |
| Random fact: Character names must appear plausible and should consist of at least a first name and a surname. Exceptions to this will only be granted at Moderation's discretion and where a very strong case has been presented |
| Random quote: "What are you trying to protect heterosexual marriages from? There isn't a limited amount of love in Iowa. It isn't a non-renewable resource. If Amy and Barbara or Mike and Steve love each other, it doesn't mean that John and Mary can't." - Ed Fallon |