We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Quota Law

Details

Submitted by^[?]: Freedom Party

Status^[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2110

Description^[?]:

I would like to see it reduced to 6 a year, which is 18 every electoral term. 18 max quota, which means you can store up a whole term of proposals. What are your thoughts?

Proposals

Article 1

Proposal^[?] to change The number of proposals a party can introduce per year (will be handed out as a monthly quota).

Old value:: 8

Current: 20

Proposed: 6

Article 2

Proposal^[?] to change The maximum proposal quota a party can accumulate.

Old value:: 15

Current: 20

Proposed: 18

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date	04:47:58, September 02, 2005 CET
From	Greens Party of Rutania
To	Debating the Quota Law
Message	what's wrong with the current system?

Date	10:50:23, September 02, 2005 CET
From	Freedom Party
To	Debating the Quota Law
Message	With so many parties, we might get dozens of bills all at once leading to frantic debating and will reduce the quality and quantity of our debates

Date	11:19:55, September 02, 2005 CET
From	Liberal Imperialist Party
To	Debating the Quota Law
Message	Against. We dont support restricting Parliament.

Date	11:53:12, September 02, 2005 CET
From	Freedom Party
To	Debating the Quota Law
Message	I cant see people having more than 18 bills to propose in one term,

Date	11:53:22, September 02, 2005 CET
From	Freedom Party
To	Debating the Quota Law
Message	^18 proposals not bills

Date	14:38:56, September 02, 2005 CET
From	Liberal Imperialist Party
To	Debating the Quota Law
Message	Neither can we, but it's the principle that's at stake. Parliament shouldnt be restricted. [OOC: Unless there is major bill spamming, but there isnt ATM.]

Date	17:42:00, September 02, 2005 CET
From	Radical Freedom Party
To	Debating the Quota Law
Message	We support.

Date	00:16:54, September 03, 2005 CET
From	Freedom Party
To	Debating the Quota Law
Message	Well RSDP and the Greens have done in the past ;-)

Date	09:18:52, September 04, 2005 CET
From	RSDP - Democratic Front
To	Debating the Quota Law
Message	We never bill-spammed. ;-) We merely fulfilled our role as the opposition.

Date	19:44:35, September 04, 2005 CET
From	Freedom Party
To	Debating the Quota Law
Message	Submitting this to a test vote everyone to see if it will pass

Date	21:11:34, September 04, 2005 CET
From	Conservative Party
To	Debating the Quota Law
Message	Eh, I'd favor placing an unlimited amount of bills to be proposed, we've never had a problem with it here (and what about the test bills)

Date	21:25:42, September 04, 2005 CET
From	New Democracy
To	Debating the Quota Law
Message	For.

Date	16:16:23, September 05, 2005 CET
From	Greens Party of Rutania
To	Debating the Quota Law
Message	Against, while a concern we can't compromise our democracy just to avoid spam

Date	14:39:40, September 12, 2005 CET
From	Freedom Party
To	Debating the Quota Law
Message	As advocates for smaller government - that fewer laws generally mean better laws and less government means less bad governance

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote

Seats

yes

Freedom Party (91)
Veritaserum (67)

Total Seats: 158

Total Seats: 354

abstain

Civic Democratic Party (87)
New Democracy (0)

Total Seats: 87

Random fact: "Doxxing", or the publishing of personally identifiable information about another player without permission, is forbidden.

Random quote: "You don't have to buy from anyone. You don't have to work at any particular job. You don't have to participate in any given relationship. You can choose." - Harry Browne

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 84